Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3st0i$1jtfh$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: how Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:52:18 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: <v3st0i$1jtfh$1@dont-email.me> References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <6350e436-cfa4-427d-989e-1b0d42814aae@att.net> <gPIb8gJTMEpIMJaytuQuxV6869U@jntp> <673764b9-69b9-41a2-ab82-bf90d8dee8e8@att.net> <DSsi9L0M1oTRAKCwCD51ban-egM@jntp> <f19c9718-9faf-4376-9c7d-5b0ec5ccce49@att.net> <5cjx16x9QcPy_u3MHizdiDCz_W8@jntp> <bd0ded55-16d4-454f-af12-896f024368d8@att.net> <bbfAzB76a9GzcAGShLauCHw3_MA@jntp> <5424f82c-1f04-43af-8963-3e325d797c8e@att.net> <vJvCxLOj98F4nrRmEh2M6dyGkSc@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 19:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bf97972b95417aa0324e520b745d0f8f"; logging-data="1701361"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZGBCiahhnv1C2JKR/T9legY6rv1Vy1AE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PpbMI+T8xZoVU2RLA4Vy7kBBXww= In-Reply-To: <vJvCxLOj98F4nrRmEh2M6dyGkSc@jntp> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2465 On 6/5/2024 1:39 PM, WM wrote: > Le 05/06/2024 à 21:28, Jim Burns a écrit : >> On 6/5/2024 6:43 AM, WM wrote: >>> Le 04/06/2024 à 23:31, Jim Burns a écrit : >>>> On 6/4/2024 10:10 AM, WM wrote: >>>>> Le 04/06/2024 à 04:07, Jim Burns a écrit : >> >>>>>> Assumption (2.) describes >>>>>> objects in our familiar arithmetic. >>>>> >>>>> That is true >>>> >>>> Thank you. >> >>>> Assumption 2. >>>> ℕ⁺ holds all.and.only >>>> numbers countable.to by.1 from.0 >>> >>> Of course. >> >> Assumption 2 in detail. > > does not contradict that contrary to Cantor's claim most natural numbers > are uncountable, although with n also n^n^n is countable. >> > >>> For all counted n: >>> |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. >> >> not.exists n ∈ ℕ⁺: |ℕ⁺\{n≥}| ≠ ℵ₀ >> >> What do you (WM) think that proves? > > It proves that people who say so are stupid and cannot understand that > ℵo natural numbers will remain uncounted forever. uncounted implies that they are finite? You are the stupid one?