Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:08:15 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3tq2f$388rj$4@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3sh0t$1gra7$12@dont-email.me> <v3slmg$vio$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:08:15 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3416947"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v3slmg$vio$1@news.muc.de>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1786
Lines: 16

On 6/6/24 11:47 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Richard doesn't call "people" liars, he calls specifically you one.  I
> wish he would do so less often, because it lowers the tone of the
> newsgroup.  Nevertheless, you_are_  a liar.

I will note that I only use the term when Peter repeat the same 
falsehood multiple times ignoring the explaination of why it is wrong.

Such behavior proves that he isn't making an "honest mistake" but is 
being willfully deceitful and ignoring the truth.

I offered to stop using the term if he will stop just repeating his 
statements without trying to defend them, but maybe he is honest enough 
to know that he couldn't keep that promise, since he CAN'T defend his 
statements, since he just doesn't know the basics to try to break his 
statements down finer to something that explains them (without totally 
proving them wrong)