Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: When Olcott calls people liars he lies
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:08:17 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3tq2h$388rj$5@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3sh0t$1gra7$12@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:08:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3416947"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3sh0t$1gra7$12@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2680
Lines: 53

On 6/6/24 10:27 AM, olcott wrote:
> The common meaning of the term [lie] is
> 
> noun
> (1) a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive;
> an intentional untruth.
> 
> verb (used without object)
> (1) to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with
> intent to deceive. Synonyms: fib, prevaricate
> 
> When Richard calls people liars and does not mean they have any
> intent to deceive this makes Richard a liar because Richard knows
> that people will be lead to believe that he is using the common
> definition that requires an intent to deceive.
> 
> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
> 
> 
> 

Except that isn't the only definition, so you are JUST LYING Again.

I am using:

lie noun(2)
1 b: an untrue or inaccurate statement that may or may not be believed 
true by the speaker or writer

 From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lie#dictionary-entry-3


Remember in general English, the speaker gets to use the words in the 
way they want to.

This has been explained to you, so your calling be a liar for calling 
you a liar is a lie by even YOUR definition, since you have known that 
your definition isn't the one I am using.

Note, even legally, your definition doesn't hold, as a statement done 
with reckless disreguard for the truth, so even if they don't "beleive" 
they are wrong, but a normal competent person would see the error, makes 
it legally a lie


Note also, even your own source defends me, as it says:

3: an inaccurate or untrue statement; falsehood:

And that describes your statements, your ignorant denial of the truth 
doesn't sheild your statements from being lies.

So, you are AGAIN just proven to be a liar that is trying to deceive 
people with slanted definitions.