Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v3tqo1$1t2fv$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3tqo1$1t2fv$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:19:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <v3tqo1$1t2fv$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <v38opv$1gsj2$3@dont-email.me>
	<v38riq$1aqo$1@gal.iecc.com> <niki5jps7jn2qfkj0t3s2t82qmrjoc97pi@4ax.com>
	<v3d9bh$s9a$2@gal.iecc.com> <gf6l5jtdreabgsud0qss6fu0cs17udisdb@4ax.com>
	<v3ejn5$2m8fn$1@dont-email.me> <v3lqo9$48om$4@dont-email.me>
	<soE7O.5245$Ktt5.2694@fx40.iad> <v3o7ot$kfrm$5@dont-email.me>
	<cme26jttmuh5i0l31fo5ch18g221oku84q@4ax.com> <08j8O.2408$R506.881@fx36.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:19:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="21a6995757d724b8d83dd14f044d030a";
	logging-data="2001407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ItGRa8ZNjQHYCmYJaWdBs"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ksZ7ChFQSXXwiua3rk/iI2+FDVE=
Bytes: 1748

>>A long time ago, there was a story going around about Microsoft vs IBM
>>regarding the day-to-day operation of their company web sites.  It
>>claimed that Microsoft was running a ~1000 machine server farm with a
>>crew of ~100, whereas IBM was running 3 mainframes with a crew of ~10.

Those mainframes were probably running Linux.

Not sure why a comparison with servers running Windows is relevant to the 
point I was making, anyway.