Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact ---
 last communication with Richard
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:56:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <v3tstr$1td1o$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3og6b$328ec$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v3ogh9$pi6u$1@dont-email.me> <v3oi5t$328ec$13@i2pn2.org>
 <v3oifv$psat$1@dont-email.me> <v3ojg2$328eb$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3ok3p$q2fh$1@dont-email.me> <v3ol8s$328ec$14@i2pn2.org>
 <v3olkf$q9du$1@dont-email.me> <v3piaa$33gmb$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3plp1$v133$2@dont-email.me> <v3qsi6$354ia$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r1pl$16gjs$1@dont-email.me> <v3r24v$354i9$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r2pb$16lke$1@dont-email.me> <v3r39a$354ia$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r3hd$1ahl1$1@dont-email.me> <v3r6mt$354i9$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r7p2$1b63v$1@dont-email.me> <v3r914$354i9$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r9ds$1b96e$1@dont-email.me> <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> <v3rc4m$354i9$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v3rcgn$1bpcn$1@dont-email.me> <v3rcks$354i9$9@i2pn2.org>
 <v3rd3r$1bsem$1@dont-email.me> <v3s5g6$36git$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3sc8c$1gra7$2@dont-email.me> <v3tq33$388rj$13@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:56:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad5aa88e540ea762834522b410d9de6a";
	logging-data="2012216"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ei5nyKIRjZSMN1lVEGAAe"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FXI6wp/jx9snrY2n7nSn3TG1njE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3tq33$388rj$13@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 7047

On 6/6/2024 9:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/6/24 9:06 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/6/2024 6:11 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/6/24 12:14 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2024 11:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/6/24 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation of a machine indicates what it will do after 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the simulation stopped, and that the simulation of a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DIFFERENT machine tells you of the behavior of a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different machine then simulated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any HH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001dbe]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just don't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> care about that worthless claim. Only when you cross the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> line from talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the OBJECTIVE behavior of the machine the input 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> represents to a Halt Decider, will you get me caring, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> slapping you down hard with a factual rebuttal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> damn because it is MEANINGLESS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, 
>>>>>>>>>>> because I am not willing to put that effort into your 
>>>>>>>>>>> worthless claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, 
>>>>>>>>> because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless 
>>>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because 
>>>>>>> I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>
>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I 
>>>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>
>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I 
>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>>
>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF*
>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF*
>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF*
>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF*
>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF*
>>
>> THUS THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT UNTIL
>> YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT
> 
> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am 
> not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
> 

Then I am no longer willing to talk to you.
It is not a worthless claim it is the validation of the
essence of my life's work.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer