| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v3ttbv$1tf1e$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:04:31 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 127 Message-ID: <v3ttbv$1tf1e$1@dont-email.me> References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3og6b$328ec$10@i2pn2.org> <v3ogh9$pi6u$1@dont-email.me> <v3oi5t$328ec$13@i2pn2.org> <v3oifv$psat$1@dont-email.me> <v3ojg2$328eb$1@i2pn2.org> <v3ok3p$q2fh$1@dont-email.me> <v3ol8s$328ec$14@i2pn2.org> <v3olkf$q9du$1@dont-email.me> <v3piaa$33gmb$1@i2pn2.org> <v3plp1$v133$2@dont-email.me> <v3qsi6$354ia$1@i2pn2.org> <v3r1pl$16gjs$1@dont-email.me> <v3r24v$354i9$4@i2pn2.org> <v3r2pb$16lke$1@dont-email.me> <v3r39a$354ia$5@i2pn2.org> <v3r3hd$1ahl1$1@dont-email.me> <v3r6mt$354i9$6@i2pn2.org> <v3r7p2$1b63v$1@dont-email.me> <v3r914$354i9$7@i2pn2.org> <v3r9ds$1b96e$1@dont-email.me> <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org> <v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> <v3rc4m$354i9$8@i2pn2.org> <v3rcgn$1bpcn$1@dont-email.me> <v3rcks$354i9$9@i2pn2.org> <v3rd3r$1bsem$1@dont-email.me> <v3s5g6$36git$2@i2pn2.org> <v3sc8c$1gra7$2@dont-email.me> <v3tq33$388rj$13@i2pn2.org> <v3tstr$1td1o$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad5aa88e540ea762834522b410d9de6a"; logging-data="2014254"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18q+x7YqUiPGZUKASEdBJRs" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rt6tpFR/KMjWAI4L2QGdCUFwBPk= In-Reply-To: <v3tstr$1td1o$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 7524 On 6/6/2024 9:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/6/2024 9:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 6/6/24 9:06 AM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/6/2024 6:11 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 6/6/24 12:14 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/2024 11:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 6/6/24 12:04 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation of a machine indicates what it will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the simulation stopped, and that the simulation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a DIFFERENT machine tells you of the behavior of a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different machine then simulated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any HH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001dbe] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't care about that worthless claim. Only when you cross >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the line from talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH >>>>>>>>>>>>>> saw, to the OBJECTIVE behavior of the machine the input >>>>>>>>>>>>>> represents to a Halt Decider, will you get me caring, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> slapping you down hard with a factual rebuttal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any HH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001dbe] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> damn because it is MEANINGLESS. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, >>>>>>>>>>>> because I am not willing to put that effort into your >>>>>>>>>>>> worthless claim. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, >>>>>>>>>> because I am not willing to put that effort into your >>>>>>>>>> worthless claim. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, >>>>>>>> because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless >>>>>>>> claim. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>> >>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because >>>>>> I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>> >>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I >>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >>> >>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF* >>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF* >>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF* >>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF* >>> *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY PROOF* >>> >>> THUS THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT UNTIL >>> YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT >> >> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am >> not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >> > > Then I am no longer willing to talk to you. > It is not a worthless claim it is the validation of the > essence of my life's work. > My relentless pursuit did eventually wear you down so that you finally admitted that you have been simply dodging the point for three years with CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT strawman deception fake rebuttals. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer