Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3ttti$1tiem$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Stephen Fuld" <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 03:13:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v3ttti$1tiem$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <soE7O.5245$Ktt5.2694@fx40.iad> <v3o7ot$kfrm$5@dont-email.me> <cme26jttmuh5i0l31fo5ch18g221oku84q@4ax.com> <v3s83a$2dgh$1@gal.iecc.com> <v3tr3p$1t2fv$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:13:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1f2c39597d6855cbc93f15bdbec06a26";
	logging-data="2017750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9TUlXgxQ+ytURiCfCnzZIx93I0beOZXw="
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZdutYzZOmp6LzMGuF2tJeXlSs+o=
Bytes: 2308

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 11:55:22 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
> 
> > If you're doing something that is mostly read-only and easy to
> > parallelize, then it makes sense to use a farm of cheap PCs. But if
> > you are a bank or an airline, you need to be able to lock your
> > database so that you debit a bank account or sell a plane seat
> > exactly once.  There is a rule of thumb that the cost of locking
> > something grows roughly as the square of the number of things
> > contending for the lock.
> 
> Remember that the number of users actually buying a product at any
> given time is only a small proportion (say 1%) of the number of users
> currently accessing the site.

I don't know where you got that number, but even if it is true for a
retail storefront type site, I am pretty sure it isn't true for a bank
(what John was talking about, and a substantial part of mainframes's
user base).  Few people "browse" bank's the products.  :-)  Even for an
airline (the other example John gave.) I suspect that far more than 1%
of the accesses are updates.



-- 
 - Stephen Fuld 
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)