Article <v3vhp2$25ojk$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v3vhp2$25ojk$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v3vhp2$25ojk$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:58:58 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <v3vhp2$25ojk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3sh0t$1gra7$12@dont-email.me> <v3slmg$vio$1@news.muc.de>
 <v3tq2f$388rj$4@i2pn2.org> <v3vggb$a5e$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 19:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="38a6c8611b5b06dec5d677dcd047c039";
	logging-data="2286196"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eYPpk0Df9kc13vMycUKhi"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LWYd2v48e8U/OBBzhHxQFE941ew=
In-Reply-To: <v3vggb$a5e$1@news.muc.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2675

On 6/7/2024 12:37 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:

On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
 >>
 >> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK
 >> TO ME ABOUT UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT
 >> I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT
 >
 > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you
 > are correct, because I am not willing to put
 > that effort into your worthless claim.
 >

Richard has finally admitted that he never looked at
any of these proofs thus finally admitting that his
dishonest dodge CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT strawman deception
fake rebuttal was always dishonest and deceptive.

Try to show how this DD correctly simulated by any HH ever
stops running without having its simulation aborted by HH.

_DD()
[00001e12] 55         push ebp
[00001e13] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp
[00001e15] 51         push ecx
[00001e16] 8b4508     mov  eax,[ebp+08]
[00001e19] 50         push eax      ; push DD
[00001e1a] 8b4d08     mov  ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001e1d] 51         push ecx      ; push DD
[00001e1e] e85ff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH

A {correct simulation} means that each instruction of the
above x86 machine language of DD is correctly simulated
by HH and simulated in the correct order.

Anyone claiming that HH should report on the behavior
of the directly executed DD(DD) is requiring a violation
of the above definition of correct simulation.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer