Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.space.net!news.muc.de!.POSTED.news.muc.de!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard
Followup-To: comp.theory
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:57:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: muc.de e.V.
Message-ID: <v3vont$a5e$3@news.muc.de>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me>   <v3s5g6$36git$2@i2pn2.org> <v3sc8c$1gra7$2@dont-email.me> <v3tq33$388rj$13@i2pn2.org> <v3tstr$1td1o$2@dont-email.me> <v3tuqh$388ri$1@i2pn2.org> <v3v0qj$22vrk$1@dont-email.me> <v3v85d$39ri5$11@i2pn2.org> <v3vacl$242e9$8@dont-email.me> <v3vh9l$a5e$2@news.muc.de> <v3vhvq$25ojk$2@dont-email.me> <v3vj8p$39ri6$7@i2pn2.org> <v3vk9b$266aq$2@dont-email.me> <8c92495d4433776d8ddc4706fb1de05b245f5829.camel@gmail.com> <v3vn5u$26d04$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:57:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.muc.de; posting-host="news.muc.de:2001:608:1000::2";
	logging-data="10414"; mail-complaints-to="news-admin@muc.de"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p5 (amd64))
Bytes: 3078
Lines: 49

[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

[ .... ]

> If people are going to be dishonest about simple things such as the
> actual behavior of actual x86 code where they consistently deny
> verified facts ....

You should stop swearing.  "Verified facts" has a meaning, and that
meaning isn't "false things Peter Olcott would like to be true".

You've been dishonest about verified facts right from the beginning.  For
example, the Halting Theorem is a conclusively proven verified fact.
Your refusing to accept that has just led to an enormous waste of
people's time, most notably your own.

> .... then we certainly cannot trust these people with more difficult
> issues that require at least some slight degree of judgment call.

I trust "these people".  I do not, and cannot, trust you.

> When we can show that even in the halting problem HH
> is only required to report on the behavior of DD correctly
> simulated by HH these dishonest people merely use that
> as another deflection point for their dishonesty.

The above is a distortion of the truth.  The dishonesty here is not
"theirs".

> The way around this that just worked is to stay diligently
> focused one one single point until the dishonest people
> finally admit that they have simply ignored all the proofs
> for three solid years.

Otherwise known as spamming the newsgroup.  The word "proof" also has a
meaning, and that meaning isn't "false statements repeated ad nauseam by
Peter Olcott".  You should stop misusing that word.  It means something
you don't understand.

[ .... ]

> -- 
> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).