Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v42u03$2u4lh$9@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 00:45:55 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <v42u03$2u4lh$9@dont-email.me>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <v38of2$1gsj2$1@dont-email.me>
	<v39v87$1n7bk$1@dont-email.me> <20240530170836.00005fa0@yahoo.com>
	<v3a3k5$1ntrn$1@dont-email.me> <20240530180345.00003d9f@yahoo.com>
	<v3chc4$27uij$1@dont-email.me> <20240531161937.000063af@yahoo.com>
	<20240531162811.00006719@yahoo.com> <20240531164835.00007128@yahoo.com>
	<v3cldt$28n91$2@dont-email.me> <20240531173437.00003bee@yahoo.com>
	<v3d3ct$2b5sl$1@dont-email.me> <v3d97c$2c6ea$1@dont-email.me>
	<22r6O.5934$xPJ1.2590@fx09.iad> <v3t6nu$1liet$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3tlmo$1o860$7@dont-email.me> <v427sv$2no3h$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 02:45:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e98d6c6f2f9dfe52aa544b0d04bc91ad";
	logging-data="3084977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ikxGgeaDypQzsfPU7xyU8"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0mEWN1FCVV10kbwDftYkGlTTcVI=
Bytes: 2432

On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 19:28:47 +0100, Malcolm McLean wrote:

> On 07/06/2024 01:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:38:21 -0500, BGB-Alt wrote:
>> 
>>> *2: Seemingly the main way I am aware of to get small binaries is to
>>> use an older version of MSVC (such as 6.0 to 9.0), as the binary-bloat
>>> started to get much more obvious around Visual Studio 2010, but is
>>> less of an issue with VS2005 or VS2008.
>> 
>> Newer version of proprietary compiler generates worse code than older
>> version?!?
>
> If the code is calling extern gunctions that do IO, we woul expect these
> to be massively more sophisticated on a modern ststem Witha little
> comouter, pribtf just wtites acharacter raster and utimalthe he Os picks
> the up and flushes it out to a pixel raster. And that' aal it's doing.
> Whilst on a modrern syste, stdout can do whole lot of intricate things.

Nothing to do with the compiler, though.