Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:40:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v44pe7$3g17f$2@i2pn2.org>
References: <v44i60$3jnc8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:40:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3671279"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1482
Lines: 13

Am Sun, 09 Jun 2024 10:36:32 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> When we ask the question: What is a truthmaker? The generic answer is
> whatever makes an expression of language true <is> its truthmaker. This
> entails that if there is nothing in the universe that makes expression X
> true then X lacks a truthmaker and is untrue.
What even is a truthmaker?

> X may be untrue because X is false. In that case ~X has a truthmaker.
> Now we have the means to unequivocally define truth-bearer. X is a
> truth-bearer iff (if and only if) X or ~X has a truthmaker.
What if both or none have a truthmaker?

-- 
joes