Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: RF Connector Type ID
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:42:52 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 111
Message-ID: <v44pes$3lquc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v426ri$2ni84$1@dont-email.me>
 <f1d96jtvb2pokgermt7fqt751ed9gpjfcn@4ax.com> <v42jgp$2gbeq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v42ju0$2gbeq$2@dont-email.me> <97s96j5fajs26f6eg9odqs48skgghoson5@4ax.com>
 <v43vk8$3dhg7$2@dont-email.me> <ntfb6jlp9g4i62rdkjv3fr692jm46u541i@4ax.com>
 <v44lvb$3kncn$2@dont-email.me> <8kob6j1igv9nf27s9jp75cijdslie6e68h@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 19:40:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d5bb2651e497ec06f1079f3dcd2e601";
	logging-data="3861452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/o6zD43vqHR5X9UauUVqxP"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2CgHueLS2NLMRw/rbAXbE9KFtX0=
In-Reply-To: <8kob6j1igv9nf27s9jp75cijdslie6e68h@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5733

On 6/9/24 19:25, john larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:41:15 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:03:18 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:19:52 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 17:06:18 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 22:54:07 +0100, John R Walliker
>>>>> <jrwalliker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/06/2024 22:47, John R Walliker wrote:
>>>>>>> On 08/06/2024 20:43, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:10:59 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gentlemen,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can anyone identify these connectors? HP use 'em an awful lot for
>>>>>>>>> interconnecting the boards of their analyzers to route 50 ohm RF
>>>>>>>>> signals around the various inside sections.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://disk.yandex.com/i/LQ1ytGUQCf7OTw
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably SMBs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most of the connectors in the image look like SMB which is a "click
>>>>>> on"
>>>>>> push fit connector and is cylindrical at the end.  A few which have a
>>>>>> hex profile at the end may be SMC which is a threaded connector.
>>>>>> SMA is threaded and a bit larger, but has the best high frequency
>>>>>> performance of them all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> We like SMBs because that are quick to mate and un-mate without tools,
>>>>> so can be mounted very close together. They work fine to 6 or 8 GHz,
>>>>> about what you can do with discretes on FR4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shining Star makes nice cheap edge-launch SMAs and SMBs. A proper pad
>>>>> stack keeps things 50 ohms.
>>>>
>>>> Could you possibly expand on that last sentence, please? I've never
>>>> encountered a 'pad stack' before.
>>>
>>> A PCB's pad stack is a diagram of the number of conductive and
>>> insulating layers and their thickesses and composition. It must be
>>> specified when you buy a board.
>>>
>>> Sometimes you get to choose between a few canned stacks, and sometimes
>>> you diagram your own.
>>>
>>> We mostly do 4 and 6-layer boards, with some 2-layer and the occasional
>>> 8 or even 10 copper layers. Never single layer.
>>>
>>> Our boards are mostly 0.062" thick, and I like layer 2 to be a solid
>>> ground plane. Some internal layers are power planes. If you solder an
>>> edge-launch SMA or SMB connector to layer 1, the layer 2 ground plane is
>>> too close to the center pin of the connector, so that bit of the signal
>>> path is too low impedance. So one does creative shaped cutouts in the
>>> various layers to keep the impedance uniform and the reflections down.
>>> We did e-m simulations (with ATLC) and test boards to get that right.
>>>
>>> The cheaper connectors have a giant round center pin, which requires
>>> attention.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/vfi56wy5hkwva51bx77z6/SS_SMA_Edge.JPG?
>> rlkey=nbmbyb0f54uslcpc0nh7rs21p&raw=1
>>>
>>> That pin is around 100 ohms in free space!
>>>
>>> There are more expensive conectors with a tiny flat pin that
>>> theoretically matches a layer 1 trace width directly, but I haven't
>>> found them to be worth it on FR4 boards and 30 ps edges.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rptmh5f4umscqqpegatw6/Mueller_SMA.JPG?
>> rlkey=1eonuljqekvrszyb9tce5s1hr&raw=1
>>
>> Thanks, John; I'm somewhat less ignorant now than I was!
>> Seriously though, it's clear the reason I've not encountered these is due
>> to the fact I just experiment with single layer boards which don't need
>> them, from what you implicitly state. Life must get really "interesting"
>> with RF in multi-layer boards. ;-)
> 
> We do picosecond time-domain stuff, which resembles RF except that is
> broadband, all the way down to DC, so we can't tweak to tune things
> into some narrow RF band.
> 
> I expect that it's impossible to do really fast stuff, 30 GHz-ish,
> with parts soldered to FR4 PC boards.
> 
> I just disassembled a National Instruments PXIe RF module (with great
> difficulty) and it's really bizarre. And it's only 6 GHz!
> 
> I might post some pics.
> 

Yes please!

Jeroen Belleman