Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:47:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v44ps5$3g17f$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3j20v$3gm10$2@dont-email.me>
	<J_CdnTaA96jxpcD7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<87h6eamkgf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v3kcdj$3stk9$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3l7uo$13cp$8@dont-email.me> <v3lcat$228t$3@dont-email.me>
	<v3mq9j$chc3$1@dont-email.me> <v3mrli$chc4$1@dont-email.me>
	<_gWdnbwuZPJP2sL7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<v3nkqr$h7f9$3@dont-email.me> <v3p4ka$sk6h$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3pp7p$v133$8@dont-email.me> <v3s27e$1f9kd$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3sf1n$1gra7$11@dont-email.me> <v3sjo9$1ialb$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3skoo$1iedv$1@dont-email.me> <v3u9ej$1v7rn$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3v6i7$23l33$1@dont-email.me> <v3vse5$3ao52$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v401dt$287qb$8@dont-email.me> <v40ufq$2gjsq$1@dont-email.me>
	<v41kse$2jqdk$9@dont-email.me> <v41nav$3crhv$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v43qfj$3bnt7$1@dont-email.me> <v44cms$3harn$6@dont-email.me>
	<v44gq7$3jbv3$1@dont-email.me> <v44kec$3jnc8$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:47:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3671279"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3068
Lines: 29

Am Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:15:08 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/9/2024 10:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-09 14:03:08 +0000, olcott said:
>>> On 6/9/2024 3:52 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-08 13:46:07 +0000, joes said:
>>>>> Am Sat, 08 Jun 2024 08:04:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 6/8/2024 1:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-07 22:26:05 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>> On 6/7/2024 4:00 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 09:47:35 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/2024 1:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-06 15:31:36 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/2024 10:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-06 13:53:58 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/2024 5:15 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-05 13:29:28 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 2:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-04 18:02:03 +0000, olcott said:

> Directly executed DD(DD) and DD correctly simulated by HH are two
> different sequences of configurations and HH is only held accountable
> for the latter.
As a simulator, HH must simulate the same sequence.

> The everyone disagrees with this verified fact that HH correctly
> simulated by DD DOES NOT HALT is less than no rebuttal at all.
If the simulated DD doesn't halt, its direct execution can't halt either.

-- 
joes