Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a
 defamation case
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 20:48:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 112
Message-ID: <v45m0m$3ukqt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v44dle$3i5jo$2@dont-email.me> <v44jvn$3jnc8$3@dont-email.me>
 <v44qin$3g17f$5@i2pn2.org> <v44ru8$3m841$3@dont-email.me>
 <v44usm$3g17f$6@i2pn2.org> <v45fq4$3sv37$1@dont-email.me>
 <v45h1l$3h642$1@i2pn2.org> <v45h88$3tjc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v45i42$3h641$2@i2pn2.org> <v45ive$3tpr9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v45jqr$3h642$3@i2pn2.org> <v45kiu$3ue8q$2@dont-email.me>
 <v45lak$3h641$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:48:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6820c6f88a6ab7f47362bcc86c8cb3a";
	logging-data="4150109"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18i1oijusdyWDkoEGrd97mw"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vOZEveOMr6oC6Kx7YSPIgwWljdc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v45lak$3h641$3@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 5407

On 6/9/2024 8:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/9/24 9:23 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/9/2024 8:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/9/24 8:56 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/2024 7:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/9/24 8:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/9/2024 7:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/9/24 8:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2024 2:13 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am Sun, 09 Jun 2024 13:23:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2024 12:59 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Am Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:07:19 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)(); // pointer to void function 01   void 
>>>>>>>>>>>> HHH(ptr
>>>>>>>>>>>> P, ptr I)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 02   {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 03     P(I);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 04     return;
>>>>>>>>>>>> 05   }
>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 07   void DDD(int (*x)())
>>>>>>>>>>>> 08   {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 09     HHH(x, x);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 10     return;
>>>>>>>>>>>> 11   }
>>>>>>>>>>>> 12 13   int main()
>>>>>>>>>>>> 14   {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 15     HHH(DDD,DDD);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 16   }
>>>>>>>>>>>> 17
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In the above Neither DDD nor HHH ever reach their own return 
>>>>>>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>>>>>>> thus never halt.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of my reviewers incorrectly believe that when HH(DD,DD) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> aborts
>>>>>>>>>>>> its simulated input that this simulated input halts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You chopped out the mandatory prerequisite.
>>>>>>>>>> Please go back and prove that you understand what infinite 
>>>>>>>>>> recursion is
>>>>>>>>>> before proceeding.
>>>>>>>>> Dude, I've got nothing to prove to you. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK then we are done talking.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You instead could explain how you
>>>>>>>>> can call a simulation that differs from the direct execution 
>>>>>>>>> "correct".
>>>>>>>>> Or why H and HH are different.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I could but you refuse to go through the steps of the proof,
>>>>>>>> one-at-a-time with mutual agreement at each step.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not going to tolerate circular head games that never
>>>>>>>> result in any mutual agreement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I.E. Someone else is calling you out on your incorrect logic, so 
>>>>>>> you are threatening to take your ball and go home.,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We must go through the steps one-at-a-time and have mutual agreement
>>>>>> on each step to eliminate miscommunication intentional or otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, when someone questions what you mean by something, you need to 
>>>>> clearify the meaning of it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When someone "questions what you mean by something"
>>>> by calling me a liar they may go to actual Hell.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I only call you after you repeat the same basic lie several times 
>>> after being corrected.
>>>
>>> That is a valid definition of a Liar, and you fit.
>>>
>>
>> THIS IS AN OFFICIAL CEASE AND DESIST NOTIFICATION.
>> STOP CALLING ME A LIAR.
>>
>>
> 
> Then stop Lying!
> 

*I never have lied and you know it*
*THAT YOU REFUSE TO EVEN POINT OUT ANY 100% SPECIFIC MISTAKE*
*AND PERSIST IN CALLING ME A LIAR AFTER A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER*
*WINS DEFAMATION CASES*

*I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS*
*I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS*
*I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS*

That D is correctly simulated by H is proved by the fact that
the x86 source-code of D exactly matches the two execution
traces that I provided. *It is much easier to see in Google Groups*

On 5/29/2021 2:26 PM, olcott wrote:
[Would the simulation of D be infinitely nested unless simulating 
partial halt decider H terminated its simulation of D?]
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/dTvIY5NX6b4/m/cHR2ZPgPBAAJ



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer