Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:21:06 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 220
Message-ID: <v46nj2$dg7s$3@dont-email.me>
References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3nbkm$fr5l$3@dont-email.me> <x_WcnRlz0JjqH8L7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me>
 <akSdnTp7Xod4lPj7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:21:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15c0df494d3af75a759cbd42baeb0f83";
	logging-data="442620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RpqIOKrpqJ8Je1FZBr2XA"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8vRfR/40UzX0I8w+G6DP8Pkgw2s=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <akSdnTp7Xod4lPj7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 12660

On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>     In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>     FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>     On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>>     So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
>>>>>>>>>>>     he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     How does eating out affect my life?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
>>>>>>>>>>     another matter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to do exactly
>>>>>>>>>     that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
>>>>>>>>>     country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
>>>>>>>>>     does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
>>>>>>>>>     affect your life, Effa?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Still no answer here.
>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>     But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
>>>>>>>>>     he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact that in many
>>>>>>>>>     cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
>>>>>>>>>     when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
>>>>>>>>>     country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
>>>>>>>>>     vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
>>>>>>>>>     regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Newsom went out to eat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
>>>>>>>     went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
>>>>>>>     Cruz only did it once.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     DeSantis is destroying a state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     Nope. False equivalence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Newsom owned up to it.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
>>>>>     caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
>>>>>     wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
>>>>>     he his state was on fire.
>>>>>     
>>>>   You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
>>>   
>>>   To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
>>>   
>>>   This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
>>>   ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
>>>   management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
>>>   severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
>>>   
>>>   Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and rode
>>>   our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
>>> completely
>>>   delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
>>> saying
>>>   that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
>>> year
>>>   (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
>>> bald-faced
>>>   liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
>>>   
>>>   Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
>>>   burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there
>>> were
>>>   any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
>>>   California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
>>> 500-year
>>>   drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts, but
>>>   that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
>>> claiming
>>>   this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
>>>   lackeys.
>>>   
>>>   Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
>>>   carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called logging.
>>> We
>>>   had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we began
>>>   imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
>>>   level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
>>> carry
>>>   out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
>>> severe
>>>   forest fires.
>>>   
>>>   We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests since
>>>   1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
>>>   period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
>>>   boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and
>>> the
>>>   public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
>>> exactly
>>>   in many cases.
>>>   
>>>   Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
>>> burn
>>>   them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
>>>   
>>>   An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When there
>>>   are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
>>>   dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be
>>> set
>>>   ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the land
>>>   can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
>>>   opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that there are
>>>   currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
>>> waiting
>>>   to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want half
>>>   the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
>>>   
>>>   That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
>>>   manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to
>>> keep
>>>   them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
>>>   decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
>>>   with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
>>> hands-off
>>>   approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
>>>   frequently ablaze.
>>>   
>>>   The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear
>>> away
>>>   dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and conduct
>>>   controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires.
>>> Then
>>>   came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those they
>>>   considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do things.
>>>   Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
>>>   
>>>   But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
>>>   Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be solved
>>>   with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if
>>> the
>>>   U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
>>>   gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we lived
>>>   that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
>>>   temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You can
>>> go
>>>   run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it.
>>>   
>>>   These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest
>>>   management problem. Period.
>>
>> You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA.
>>
>>>   NEWS & EVENTS
>>>   Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California Wildfires
>>>   Published onAugust 8, 2023
>>
>>>   In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences,
>>> an international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of
>>> summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with natural and
>>> historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========