Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: White House Surrounded
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:13:55 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v4757j$gl3k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <cfmdnYSDvpMLvfj7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4386t$358cq$2@dont-email.me>
 <992248117.739598013.600752.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
 <v44p2n$3lofd$1@dont-email.me>
 <264998006.739674714.806626.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:13:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5ce17340801d826d9f7e6a9678af8986";
	logging-data="545908"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GfKFavYS/AkW4WtVSQVrB9FU4Qawowng="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nkWYz6JvV29uE5exv5o1PwsBXtM=
In-Reply-To: <264998006.739674714.806626.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2526

On 6/9/2024 9:13 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On 6/8/2024 11:56 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems insurrectiony.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't an insurrectionist have to be an American citizen? Aren't these
>>>> foreign nationals? Is DHS offering deportation flights to Gaza?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Definitions of insurrectionist
>>> noun a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the constituted
>>> authority
>>>
>>> I don’t see anything that says you have to be under the authority of what
>>> you are rebelling against
>>> ...
>>
>> 'insurrection' -a violent uprising against an authority or government
>>
>> I think words like "rebellion" and "uprising" imply you're a subject...
>>
> 
> I agree about the implication, but it doesn’t actually seem to be required
> in the definition

Ah, because you could take part in a neighboring state's insurrection.

But then, your def. does say "THE (rather than A) constituted 
authority".  So, a non-subject insurrectionist might at least need prior 
context to establish exactly which authority he's fed up to here with.