Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v47v97$lh4k$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: how Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:38:30 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <v47v97$lh4k$4@dont-email.me> References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <65e48016-ecea-4832-bcdb-a5e3d94a66cd@att.net> <52y9XpKJ6QVz6e8s5Hvt4WK1nmE@jntp> <04ac4aa5-f508-40e1-b14f-0fa9883ac4c0@att.net> <-YYjghxYEV4-kYQzyEEkdPOmx9g@jntp> <d8638801-fa89-4764-ab60-90c690a4dc53@att.net> <cAb6HQm9T104zE20oIGGcWLO1Hk@jntp> <b6b4d308-15de-40e6-9311-d71ae43a32c3@att.net> <v42tme$2v0o0$1@dont-email.me> <c1b93fce-52c1-4993-9670-328c5b90813c@att.net> <HC-gQElPZGHOik24_cZ_fwvrpQI@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="af7387139eef2adaeed8a4c9aa891781"; logging-data="705684"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/TFSQDmUt19768JAjbXtotpWz5RvWU+0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:LR5rXmyKLz8fFlQpq2cwR5aZZ1Q= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <HC-gQElPZGHOik24_cZ_fwvrpQI@jntp> Bytes: 1958 On 6/10/2024 9:33 AM, WM wrote: > Le 09/06/2024 à 18:38, Jim Burns a écrit : > >> "One" can't perform a supertask. >> That is the crack through which >> WM's rhetoric enters. > > You need not perform a supertask! You need only define *one* natural > number that has less than almost all ℵo natural numbers following! You > can't because every number you can define has ℵo successors. That means > almost all are undefinable or dark. I take it that you mean if I say three, then surely one, two and four are dark?