Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4c9n3$1mc14$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:01:06 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v4c9n3$1mc14$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v0dmh2$1rvpq$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
 <v0dqv3$323o9$4@dont-email.me> <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com>
 <v0e6v4$1u868$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki> <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me> <v2n7ov$32fi2$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e781b59a1023c12833e514639652052";
	logging-data="1781796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HDRQ1UFRyz7/Fw6QHcmBsYDWuZJedIao="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wp9ESC/rPvVN2WTybUk+Unp1O4w=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 2237

gmkeros@gmail.com wrote:
> On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:
>> On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>>> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On 
>>> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just 
>>> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. 
>> 
>> Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations 
>> in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be 
>> sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma based 
>> arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 full 
>> physical classes.
>> 
>> As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer 
>
>Nitpick: sorcerers were a core class in 3e. Warlocks came in a 
>supplement in 3.5.
>
>I never really got sorcerers, I think they were supposed to be what the 
>warlock became later, just that it wasn't mechanically set apart from 
>wizards all that much.

Sorcerers were created for people who didn't want to play a Wizard and deal 
with its limitations. I liked it!

--
Let's go Brandon!