Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4ckrn$1ojr5$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Challenger
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:11:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <v4ckrn$1ojr5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5a5a6jtfh1je18lr297jrh10oihptl2tgo@4ax.com>
	<v43l6g$39bjl$1@dont-email.me> <c3hb6jdrp9v6rjnsd03ki2levj4ohnna8m@4ax.com>
	<v44op9$3kncn$6@dont-email.me> <3ltb6j1v7miinkbhb0f3n6gknud5j9eeb8@4ax.com>
	<v458vd$3kncn$11@dont-email.me> <v49ogt$1380c$1@dont-email.me>
	<v4ajv6$19252$1@dont-email.me> <v4badf$1gg5p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:11:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c307d9089bc1a363c07db9c326a63dfc";
	logging-data="1855333"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Tdx49kPUE0d/VbojSlvJzdQNnb5auqsw="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mDIAItqwxgWL5vfLxJMez+MLOsc=
Bytes: 3552

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:49 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

> On 12/06/2024 8:43 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:55:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/06/2024 8:05 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:47:50 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:29:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:08:26 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:21:52 +0100, Jeff Layman
>>>>>>> <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> So about as reliable a statistic as their figures for historical CO2
>>>> in the atmosphere, then.
>>>
>>> Not really. We've been observing the CO2 level in the atmosphere
>>> continuously since 1958 and Manua Loa wasn't NASA.
>>>
>>> The entirely independent Cape Grim observatory got going in 1976 -
>>> it's run by Australia's CSIRO
>>>
>>> https://capegrim.csiro.au/
>>>
>>> and presents much the same story. It's southern hemisphere rather than
>>> northern hemisphere so that the annual fluctuation isn't as big.
>>>
>>> NASA estimate of how many shuttles' they'd lose were just that - they
>>> dated back to before they'd lost any.
>>>
>>> You objections to the thoroughly reliable climate data involve your
>>> demented conspiracy theory which has everybody involved in taking the
>>> published the measurements consistently lying to the public for more
>>> than sixty years.
>>>
>>> Nobody even thought that anyone would bother until around 1990, when
>>> global warming hit statistical significance, and the fossil carbon
>>> extraction industry woke up the threat to their long term cash flows.
>> 
>> Sorry, Bill. I've got better things to do than get drawn into another
>> of your pointless pissing contests.
> 
> Lying about the science evidence demonstrating that climate change is
> happening is  a well-paid commercial activity. You aren't remotely good
> enough at it to get paid for it, but that doesn't seem to stop you
> hoping that you might.
> 
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

Nice try, Bill, but I'm not falling for it. I know a barb when I see it 
and I'm not getting hooked. Try plying your trade on some other poor sap.