Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:20:26 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <v4csdq$1q0a8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v428vv$2no74$2@dont-email.me> <v43ib7$38hnd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4628o$6ero$1@dont-email.me> <v468qt$7uvj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v47joj$je45$1@dont-email.me> <v47kt3$jhs8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v47l92$je45$2@dont-email.me> <v48tt4$tqad$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4a07r$157ic$1@dont-email.me> <v4beis$1h0p6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4cceu$1mi5i$2@dont-email.me> <v4corm$1p0h0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4cp5s$1pe0q$1@dont-email.me> <v4cs0b$1p0h1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f170c39f5487c8533188545300f883a";
	logging-data="1900872"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gy6KFp6kn5UGuPctnCKiD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:73swRUq34zk6NlO7g+OOQrdQMNc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v4cs0b$1p0h1$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3384

On 6/12/2024 2:13 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 12.jun.2024 om 20:24 schreef olcott:
>> On 6/12/2024 1:19 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 12.jun.2024 om 16:47 schreef olcott:
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no infinite nested simulation detected,
>>>>
>>>> If I am wrong then a specific sequence of steps of D correctly
>>>> simulated by H where D terminates normally can be provided.
>>>
>>> No infinite execution has been detected, 
>>
>> You seem to simply not understand that D correctly simulated
>> by H would eventually crash due to out-of-memory error.
>>
> 
> Exactly. A correct H simulated by H does not exist. But, again, you 
> misses the point. It was in the part that you omitted.
> So, again:
> 
> No infinite execution has been detected, only a premature abortion. 

On 5/29/2021 2:26 PM, olcott wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/dTvIY5NX6b4/m/cHR2ZPgPBAAJ

If that was true then you could provide every step of D correctly
simulated by H such that D simulated by H reaches its own simulated
"ret" instruction.

*That you don't do this seems to prove that you know you are a liar*

_D()
[00000cfc](01) 55          push ebp
[00000cfd](02) 8bec        mov ebp,esp
[00000cff](03) 8b4508      mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00000d02](01) 50          push eax       ; push D
[00000d03](03) 8b4d08      mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00000d06](01) 51          push ecx       ; push D
[00000d07](05) e800feffff  call 00000b0c  ; call H
[00000d0c](03) 83c408      add esp,+08
[00000d0f](02) 85c0        test eax,eax
[00000d11](02) 7404        jz 00000d17
[00000d13](02) 33c0        xor eax,eax
[00000d15](02) eb05        jmp 00000d1c
[00000d17](05) b801000000  mov eax,00000001
[00000d1c](01) 5d          pop ebp
[00000d1d](01) c3          ret
Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d]



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer