Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:53:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <v4cuc6$1qedu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v428vv$2no74$2@dont-email.me> <v43ib7$38hnd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4628o$6ero$1@dont-email.me> <v468qt$7uvj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v47joj$je45$1@dont-email.me> <v47kt3$jhs8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v47l92$je45$2@dont-email.me> <v48tt4$tqad$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4a07r$157ic$1@dont-email.me> <v4beis$1h0p6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4cceu$1mi5i$2@dont-email.me> <v4corm$1p0h0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4cp5s$1pe0q$1@dont-email.me> <v4cs0b$1p0h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4csdq$1q0a8$1@dont-email.me> <v4ctuq$1p0h1$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:53:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f170c39f5487c8533188545300f883a";
	logging-data="1915326"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qRlCJmKf9BdkjrT2YZrx4"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J9zIHCWzF4BTV418ZSWWd2RcrfU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v4ctuq$1p0h1$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3256

On 6/12/2024 2:46 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 12.jun.2024 om 21:20 schreef olcott:
>> On 6/12/2024 2:13 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 12.jun.2024 om 20:24 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 6/12/2024 1:19 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 12.jun.2024 om 16:47 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no infinite nested simulation detected,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I am wrong then a specific sequence of steps of D correctly
>>>>>> simulated by H where D terminates normally can be provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> No infinite execution has been detected, 
>>>>
>>>> You seem to simply not understand that D correctly simulated
>>>> by H would eventually crash due to out-of-memory error.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Exactly. A correct H simulated by H does not exist. But, again, you 
>>> misses the point. It was in the part that you omitted.
>>> So, again:
>>>
>>> No infinite execution has been detected, only a premature abortion. 
>>
>> On 5/29/2021 2:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/dTvIY5NX6b4/m/cHR2ZPgPBAAJ
>>
>> If that was true then you could provide every step of D correctly
>> simulated by H such that D simulated by H reaches its own simulated
>> "ret" instruction.
> 
> I said that each H is unable to hit its target, so how could it reach 
> the "ret" instruction of D? Please, think before you reply.

It is a binary choice either D correctly simulated by H can
possibly terminate normally by reaching its "ret" instruction
or not. Your attempt to twist these words to make it look like
there is more than these two possibilities is either ignorant
or deceptive.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer