Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4e235$24h7d$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: another fast one-shot
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:03:04 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 176
Message-ID: <v4e235$24h7d$1@dont-email.me>
References: <i1jj6jts49q8ilij8vv5k3hkikao3vgitv@4ax.com>
 <v4clh9$1ojr5$2@dont-email.me> <n0oj6jd9146kbual113g0qf5qt4is93qnd@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:03:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="061ca8130ff89dd3f636ba4bb4f8d77d";
	logging-data="2245869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KTATzzCeSs0H9a2RkDsEB6YcXEsAG3Qs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2O5E5uVPytKMT4e8Md9gqfqoJQ4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <n0oj6jd9146kbual113g0qf5qt4is93qnd@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240612-4, 12/6/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 6167

On 13/06/2024 4:11 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:22:49 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:33:17 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>
>>> Here's another idea for a fast one-shot. This is the just-apply-money
>>> version and should get close to 1 ns pulse width and should easily
>>> trigger at 150 MHz.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1okfo8964bw5m53mjmxs6/
>> Pecl_One_Shot_1.jpg?rlkey=dwus6qjyqsynl2rv6uje2xxtj&raw=1
>>>
>>> I can use the other half of the dual comparator elsewhere. This one has
>>> programmable hysteresis too.
>>
>> Exposing my contemptworthy ignorance here no doubt, but what exactly is it
>> that is fast about this design, John? And what would its application be?
> 
> It would have a leading-edge prop delay of 350 ps, a minimum pulse
> width just over 1 ns, and would easily trigger at 150 MHz. Integrated
> one-shots, xxx123 types, are always terrible, even the obsolete ECL
> ones.
> 
> It would be a programmable delay in a number of possible products,
> including some optical modulators. Just playing right now.
> 
> More dollars could certainly do something faster, but as long as
> customers connect boxes with cables, faster isn't worth a lot. Light
> just moves too slow.
> 
> Any suggestions for a faster one-shot?

Version 4
SHEET 1 2924 1040
WIRE -592 -720 -768 -720
WIRE 128 -720 -592 -720
WIRE 304 -720 128 -720
WIRE 768 -720 304 -720
WIRE 976 -720 768 -720
WIRE 1488 -576 1488 -720
WIRE 128 -560 128 -720
WIRE 304 -560 304 -720
WIRE 768 -560 768 -720
WIRE -592 -384 -592 -720
WIRE 1072 -368 1072 -400
WIRE 768 -320 768 -480
WIRE 960 -320 768 -320
WIRE 1008 -320 960 -320
WIRE 128 -288 128 -480
WIRE 176 -288 128 -288
WIRE 576 -288 240 -288
WIRE 768 -208 768 -320
WIRE 304 -160 304 -480
WIRE 400 -160 304 -160
WIRE 576 -160 576 -288
WIRE 576 -160 480 -160
WIRE 640 -160 576 -160
WIRE 704 -160 640 -160
WIRE -768 -64 -768 -720
WIRE 128 48 128 -288
WIRE -272 96 -432 96
WIRE 64 96 -192 96
WIRE 640 128 640 -160
WIRE 304 160 304 -160
WIRE -432 240 -432 96
WIRE -768 416 -768 16
WIRE -768 416 -880 416
WIRE -736 416 -768 416
WIRE -592 416 -592 -320
WIRE -592 416 -736 416
WIRE -496 416 -592 416
WIRE -432 416 -432 320
WIRE -432 416 -496 416
WIRE 640 416 640 208
WIRE 640 416 -432 416
WIRE 1072 416 640 416
WIRE 128 464 128 144
WIRE 768 464 768 -112
WIRE 768 464 128 464
WIRE -880 496 -880 416
WIRE 768 496 768 464
WIRE -736 640 -736 416
WIRE -496 640 -496 416
WIRE -736 656 -736 640
WIRE -736 944 -736 720
WIRE -496 944 -496 704
WIRE -496 944 -736 944
WIRE 304 944 304 240
WIRE 304 944 -496 944
WIRE 768 944 768 576
WIRE 768 944 304 944
WIRE 1760 944 768 944
FLAG -880 496 0
FLAG 960 -320 out
SYMBOL npn 64 48 R0
SYMATTR InstName Q1
SYMATTR Value BFR92A
SYMBOL npn 704 -208 R0
SYMATTR InstName Q2
SYMATTR Value BFR92A
SYMBOL voltage -768 -80 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 24 44 Left 2
SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=0.1
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMATTR Value 5.0
SYMBOL voltage -736 624 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 24 44 Left 2
SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=0.1
SYMATTR InstName V2
SYMATTR Value 4.5
SYMBOL voltage -432 224 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName V3
SYMATTR Value PULSE(0 0.2 1n 300p 300p 100p 200n 2)
SYMBOL res -176 80 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 22
SYMBOL res 752 480 R0
SYMATTR InstName R3
SYMATTR Value 360
SYMBOL res 112 -576 R0
SYMATTR InstName R4
SYMATTR Value 180
SYMBOL res 624 112 R0
SYMATTR InstName R5
SYMATTR Value 43
SYMBOL res 752 -576 R0
SYMATTR InstName R6
SYMATTR Value 180
SYMBOL res 288 -576 R0
SYMATTR InstName R2
SYMATTR Value 1k
SYMBOL cap 240 -304 R90
WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName C1
SYMATTR Value 3.3p
SYMBOL res 288 144 R0
SYMATTR InstName R7
SYMATTR Value 1k2
SYMBOL res 496 -176 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R13
SYMATTR Value 43
SYMBOL cap -608 -384 R0
SYMATTR InstName C3
SYMATTR Value 10n
SYMBOL cap -512 640 R0
SYMATTR InstName C4
SYMATTR Value 10n
TEXT -272 1000 Left 2 !.model BFR92A NPN(IS=0.1213E-15 VAF=30 BF=94.73 
IKF=0.46227  XTB=0 BR=10.729 CJC=946.47E-15 CJE=10.416E-15 TR=1.2744E-9 
TF=26.796E-12  ITF=0.0044601 VTF=0.32861  XTF=0.3817 RB=14.998 
RC=0.13793 RE=0.29088 Vceo=15 Icrating=4m mfg=Infineon)
TEXT -904 1024 Left 2 !.tran 0 500n 0

It's just a two transistor emitter-coupled monostable, but with the two 
transistors as BFR92's run at 10mA,  it produces 1nsec pulse without fuss.

Finding the broad-band PNPs to let you translate the output pulse to a 
useful voltage level is tricky. Phil Hobbs has told us that there is a 
least one still in production and available.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com