Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Underworld
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:50:48 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <v4efdo$26t0s$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4ca44$e0k$40@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:50:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="54849beccae5c99f21e20ad0d4f543cd";
	logging-data="2323484"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jB8LKGsAHVSqK+OA7DIElY4WfViPMc8Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8iHtwldzTgMM/vCs4sEzBWjYwfo=
In-Reply-To: <v4ca44$e0k$40@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 1535

The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 12:08 am:
> I can provide a review of all four parts of "Doctor Who: Underworld"
> based on the transcripts from the website you provided. I'll focus
> on the narrative elements, character development,
> and overall story progression to rate each part out of 10.

Sorry!! WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, Gobble-de-gook??

Certainly not me!!
-- 
Daniel