Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,alt.crackpot
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- simulating
 vs. deciding
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:38:15 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v4faq7$3smqv$6@i2pn2.org>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v46na7$3ifov$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v48be9$rgsh$1@dont-email.me> <v48gh6$3kcoe$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v48jv2$se9c$1@dont-email.me> <v49dge$3kcoe$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v4a0hs$157ic$3@dont-email.me> <v4ak5o$3kcoe$6@i2pn2.org>
	<v4am8r$19edk$1@dont-email.me> <v4apjs$19rnv$1@dont-email.me>
	<v4arp0$1a7uo$1@dont-email.me> <v4b1c3$3nf9n$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v4b50m$1f89t$5@dont-email.me> <v4c12r$3oop0$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v4cjl7$1o4b4$1@dont-email.me> <v4d991$3qbnc$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v4da12$1sioe$1@dont-email.me> <v4ec1a$3rbs4$6@i2pn2.org>
	<v4eqdj$28g4v$4@dont-email.me> <v4f876$3sn5q$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v4f8u0$2c3i9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:38:15 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4086623"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2959
Lines: 36

Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:06:08 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/13/2024 11:53 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 07:58:27 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 6/13/2024 3:52 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:12:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 6/12/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/12/24 12:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/12/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 11:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 9:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 8:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/2024 7:20 PM, Python wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 12/06/2024 à 01:23, olcott a écrit :

>>>>> *If that was true then you could show ALL OF THE DETAILED STEPS*
>>>>> *of the mapping that H(D,D) computes to derive that behavior*
>>>> Any UTM/simulator does it. But H must halt, so it's wrong on non-
>>>> terminating inputs.
>> A decider must halt. A simulator must have the same behaviour and can't
>> abort a nonterminating program. A halting decider is impossible.
>> 
> void Infinite_Recursion(u32 N)
> {
>    Infinite_Recursion(N);
> }
> 
> In other words you are saying that a simulating termination analyzer
> that correctly determines that the above Infinite_Recursion cannot
> possibly halt is WRONG BY DEFINITION?
Yes, because to give that result it must halt.

> *THESE PEOPLE WOULD DISAGREE*
> AProVE: Non-Termination Witnesses for C Programs
This is not a simulator.

-- 
joes