Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4gpdb$2pbb6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:53:34 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <v4gpdb$2pbb6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <v38of2$1gsj2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v39v87$1n7bk$1@dont-email.me> <20240530170836.00005fa0@yahoo.com>
 <v3a3k5$1ntrn$1@dont-email.me> <20240530180345.00003d9f@yahoo.com>
 <v3chc4$27uij$1@dont-email.me> <20240531161937.000063af@yahoo.com>
 <20240531162811.00006719@yahoo.com> <20240531164835.00007128@yahoo.com>
 <v3cldt$28n91$2@dont-email.me> <20240531173437.00003bee@yahoo.com>
 <v3d3ct$2b5sl$1@dont-email.me> <v3d97c$2c6ea$1@dont-email.me>
 <22r6O.5934$xPJ1.2590@fx09.iad> <v3t6nu$1liet$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3tlmo$1o860$7@dont-email.me> <v3vvph$27spv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v40hum$2err2$1@dont-email.me> <v40oqa$2fjig$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4enr5$28m3j$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v4fg41$2dh69$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:53:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c8e68ba7ff66e75df18542d5aa305021";
	logging-data="2927974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8rodQNVKvYpcFoYKMwD+f0sCnJ2Qn8pM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rk7+bIVZT2F4GJQn0U/hzrp1YjE=
In-Reply-To: <v4fg41$2dh69$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2421

Am 13.06.2024 um 21:07 schrieb BGB:

> A lot of people release debug builds but with the debugging data absent 
> (say, to try to reduce risk of decompilation and similar).

I don't believe that since this code isn't optimized and much larger.

> One possible justification (albeit a weak one) is that if one recompiles 
> the program with optimizations turned on, in many cases this may subtly 
> change the behavior of the program (particularly in relation to things 
> like the contents of uninitialized variables and dangling pointers, 
> etc...). ...

If you rely on that you're misusing the language anyway.