Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4gpdb$2pbb6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:53:34 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <v4gpdb$2pbb6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <v38of2$1gsj2$1@dont-email.me> <v39v87$1n7bk$1@dont-email.me> <20240530170836.00005fa0@yahoo.com> <v3a3k5$1ntrn$1@dont-email.me> <20240530180345.00003d9f@yahoo.com> <v3chc4$27uij$1@dont-email.me> <20240531161937.000063af@yahoo.com> <20240531162811.00006719@yahoo.com> <20240531164835.00007128@yahoo.com> <v3cldt$28n91$2@dont-email.me> <20240531173437.00003bee@yahoo.com> <v3d3ct$2b5sl$1@dont-email.me> <v3d97c$2c6ea$1@dont-email.me> <22r6O.5934$xPJ1.2590@fx09.iad> <v3t6nu$1liet$1@dont-email.me> <v3tlmo$1o860$7@dont-email.me> <v3vvph$27spv$1@dont-email.me> <v40hum$2err2$1@dont-email.me> <v40oqa$2fjig$1@dont-email.me> <v4enr5$28m3j$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v4fg41$2dh69$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:53:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c8e68ba7ff66e75df18542d5aa305021"; logging-data="2927974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8rodQNVKvYpcFoYKMwD+f0sCnJ2Qn8pM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rk7+bIVZT2F4GJQn0U/hzrp1YjE= In-Reply-To: <v4fg41$2dh69$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 2421 Am 13.06.2024 um 21:07 schrieb BGB: > A lot of people release debug builds but with the debugging data absent > (say, to try to reduce risk of decompilation and similar). I don't believe that since this code isn't optimized and much larger. > One possible justification (albeit a weak one) is that if one recompiles > the program with optimizations turned on, in many cases this may subtly > change the behavior of the program (particularly in relation to things > like the contents of uninitialized variables and dangling pointers, > etc...). ... If you rely on that you're misusing the language anyway.