Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4hfs2$2siee$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Mike Lynch not guilty of defrauding HP
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:16:50 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v4hfs2$2siee$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v4c4k9$1l3li$1@dont-email.me> <v4clke$1mhff$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4cmbl$1ojm6$1@dont-email.me> <v4ep0a$28rii$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4fnus$2epu0$1@dont-email.me> <v4hccd$2sino$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:16:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="623cb998fef494c201cff2f50d85c1b2";
	logging-data="3033550"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MXORfFhQhtFoyScCPo0uQXExNV7vfPFM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5Ghm5l31d/uoPfJH+eY6K4J9vIY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v4hccd$2sino$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2469

On 6/14/2024 8:17 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2024-06-13, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>> And I don't think buyer not checking information provided by
>> seller is a good argument for that false information does
>> not mean fraud.
> 
> A buyer has a duty to evaluate whether the information they are
> being told is correct or not.

They should, but that does not make it legal to provide
false information.

If one lie in financial documents to a buyer, a bank or the
tax authorities then it is fraud and one can be put in jail.

That they could check the information does not make
it non-fraud.

>                                 HP clearly did not carry out this
> process to the standards required and expected. In fact, wasn't
> one of the senior HP employees who actively warned about buying
> Autonomy either moved aside by HP or just ignored ?

HP has acknowledged that.

They did a write off of 8.8 B$.

And they want 4 B$ as compensation.

price paid - actual value = 8.8 B$
and
value per books - actual value = 4.0 B$
=>
price paid - value per books = 4.8 B$

If my math is correct then HP has already admitted that
they overpaid 4.8 B$.

And if the 4.0 B$ get reduced then the math becomes
worse.

Arne