Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4j36t$3a0ot$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 22:53:01 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 65 Message-ID: <v4j36t$3a0ot$1@dont-email.me> References: <v4j0h2$39gh7$3@dont-email.me> <v4j2ga$kqh$11@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 05:53:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="020d44455d70acf7231aebb6a85d124b"; logging-data="3474205"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/TiTfvv/LNzIvy2eNV8LbT" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:50QRBy9zM9IdW1Rcg+uX0ihKBLY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v4j2ga$kqh$11@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 3660 On 6/14/2024 10:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/14/24 11:07 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/13/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> > On 6/13/24 11:32 AM, olcott wrote: >> >> >> >> It is contingent upon you to show the exact steps of how H computes >> >> the mapping from the x86 machine language finite string input to >> >> H(D,D) using the finite string transformation rules specified by >> >> the semantics of the x86 programming language that reaches the >> >> behavior of the directly executed D(D) >> >> >> > >> > Why? I don't claim it can. >> >> _D() >> [00000cfc](01) 55 push ebp >> [00000cfd](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp >> [00000cff](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] >> [00000d02](01) 50 push eax ; push D >> [00000d03](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] >> [00000d06](01) 51 push ecx ; push D >> [00000d07](05) e800feffff call 00000b0c ; call H >> [00000d0c](03) 83c408 add esp,+08 >> [00000d0f](02) 85c0 test eax,eax >> [00000d11](02) 7404 jz 00000d17 >> [00000d13](02) 33c0 xor eax,eax >> [00000d15](02) eb05 jmp 00000d1c >> [00000d17](05) b801000000 mov eax,00000001 >> [00000d1c](01) 5d pop ebp >> [00000d1d](01) c3 ret >> Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d] >> >> If there is no mapping from the input to H(D,D) to the behavior >> of D(D) then H is not even being asked about the behavior of D(D). >> H has no obligation to answer questions *THAT IT IS NOT BEING ASKED* >> > > You keep on stating that LIE. > That is is over-your-head does not even make it untrue. That you call me a liar makes you a liar. If you want to claim that I am wrong YOU MUST USE REASONING. Calling me a liar makes you a liar and a fool. > H, being a Halting Decider (or are you lying about that) has exactly one > question it *IS* being asked about every input it s given, that that is > "Will the execution of the program represented by your input Halt when > run?" > Yes you are very good at memorizing textbooks now prove that the input to H(D,D) can be transformed into the question Does D(D) halt? >> > Why? I don't claim it can. Then H is NOT BEING ASKED ABOUT THE BEHAVIOR OF D(D). I chopped out the attempt to change the subject. *YOU MUST STAY FOCUSED ON THIS POINT* -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer