Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail
From: Screwed <screwed@scotus.com>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc,alt.bankruptcy,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution
Subject: US Supreme Court rejects bankruptcy refund that would have cost $326 million
Followup-To: talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 07:05:10 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <v4jef6$3a0f8$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 07:05:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3473896"; posting-host="UsdsZiYKRHXfHJF8iqyOmA.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-TOR-Router: sha256:MTg1LjIyMC4xMDAuMjQ0 --
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Bytes: 3709
Lines: 52

NEW YORK, June 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled that 
bankrupt companies are not entitled to be reimbursed to make up for a 
disparity in bankruptcy fees that lasted from 2018 to 2020, saying that 
U.S. taxpayers should not be on the hook for refunds that would add up to 
hundreds of millions of dollars.

The court ruled in a 6-3 opinion that Congress had intended to raise rates 
uniformly, and had already addressed the disparity by raising rates in two 
states that briefly charged lower fees. Giving refunds to every debtor in 
the other 48 states – where 98% of large bankruptcies were filed – would 
cost taxpayers $326 million and cause "extreme disruption" to bankruptcy 
courts across the U.S., Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the 
majority.

The dispute stems from a 2017 law that increased the quarterly fees that 
large companies pay to fund the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Department of 
Justice's bankruptcy watchdog. After the law went into effect, however, 
North Carolina and Alabama, the only two states that have opted out of the 
U.S. Trustee program, declined to impose a matching fee increase in their 
bankruptcy courts, causing a disparity that the Supreme Court ruled 
unconstitutional in 2022.

The Supreme Court's earlier ruling did not address whether any fees should 
be refunded as a result of the disparity, but several courts of appeals 
have ruled that debtors are entitled to refunds, which led the Justice 
Department to seek Supreme Court review of a $2.5 million refund awarded 
to John Q. Hammons Hotels & Resorts. Hammons, a bankrupt hotel company, 
filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2016 in Kansas and paid the higher 
bankruptcy fees after 2017.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett 
Kavanaugh, wrote a dissenting opinion, saying that the disparate fees were 
unconstitutional and that "refund is the traditional remedy for unlawfully 
imposed fees."

"What’s a constitutional wrong worth these days? The Court’s answer today 
seems to be: not much," Gorsuch wrote.

The case is Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 
2006 LLC, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 22-1238

For the U.S. Trustee: Masha Hansford of the U.S. Department of Justice
For Hammons: Daniel Geyser of Haynes and Boone

Read more:

US Supreme Court justices balk at $326 mln bankruptcy fee refund demand
U.S. Supreme Court finds 2017 bankruptcy fee increase was unconstitutional
Courts require repayment of Trustee Program bankruptcy fees deemed 
unconstitutional by Supreme Court

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-
bankruptcy-refund-that-would-have-cost-326-million-2024-06-14/