Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Finally iOS 18 will be able to schedule messages
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 14:29:38 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <v4k8gi$3gi5v$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v48h3v$2tgt$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lcrdpsFdhumU5@mid.individual.net>
 <v4ac62$hko$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lcs0omFgd23U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v4b8ai$23ak$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4d4lf$1rkfp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4dhf5$113n$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4e7vc$25jrp$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4fbp7$1aqf$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4ff5u$2ddp5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4fhfl$2gr9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4gopo$2p8i6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4ia5r$29kq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4ie08$32kit$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4is1d$2ag5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v4juml$3eoeo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4k5p3$uct$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:29:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d15f28c54460f2bb39ef85e9eff9a7c";
	logging-data="3688639"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mWbKYNFxnQSQnBUmnWigCcAj5HMDgNVo="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LmMYHq5jLIGwIaGfl+8ajkCtlVQ=
	sha1:EcDHoG9g0NM0lafqFdJ3+64GRAw=
Bytes: 2477

Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote on Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:42:13 -0000 (UTC) :
> 
>>> It used to shock me 
>> 
>> Repeating yourself verbatim doesn't make it less false.
> 
> I wonder if you realize how shockingly desperate you are, Chris...
> 
> What part about Apple's own published words do you claim are false?
>  <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>
> 
> You're literally desperate to claim Apple didn't say what Apple said.

I've explained it to you several times and yet you fail to grasp the simple
concept. Apple's statement is ambiguous and so your interpretation and
claim isn't categorically correct. There is an equivalent, alternative
interpretation. Plus, there is direct evidence which contradicts your
opinion.