Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4kj86$3ii7t$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Idlehands <hidefromu@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Ratings Asphyxiation for Doctor Whoke
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:32:52 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v4kj86$3ii7t$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v441bp$3dmku$1@dont-email.me> <v444qc$gut$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <xn0omvaiv8qa7nm003@post.eweka.nl> <v451ei$3ocpe$1@dont-email.me>
 <v45ea6$1v7p$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0omwjor9yc06o002@post.eweka.nl>
 <v47il6$inqo$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omwwg4afngic000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v47kgu$inqo$4@dont-email.me> <xn0omwy03ahraf9000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v47sj2$kp51$2@dont-email.me> <xn0omx0y2alqb6a000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v481u7$m48a$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omxh5haqlonv000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v486al$mnuo$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omxi64arxki1007@post.eweka.nl>
 <v48d57$rjsk$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omyb4gbv8y0v005@post.eweka.nl>
 <v4ajup$193q2$2@dont-email.me> <xn0omytv2c3hy2h000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v4aqng$19skh$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omzgm4cyexq9006@post.eweka.nl>
 <v4f8hj$2c4j2$2@dont-email.me> <v4j1lj$39qrf$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:32:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8d9460cc344d73107ed2204a7b1c2527";
	logging-data="3754237"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/v3mFZTkXZJbEen5wMn/uzREsrpsVYQUY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6ePEE+s6D0Jg0fJjhToN2IIAWCU=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v4j1lj$39qrf$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3210

On 2024-06-14 9:26 p.m., Daniel70 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 14/6/24 2:59 am:
>> On 12/06/2024 14:41, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There you go then. No famous female renaissance painters
>>>> exist. I can't think of any that existed either before or
>>>> after the renaissance either.
>>>
>>> That was a tangent I didn't see coming!
>>>
>>> Sorry, female renaissance painters are not my strong point...
>>
>> Because men are far better artists and this has to be recognised. Men 
>> must not be discriminated against for being men in order to give women 
>> who are inferior to preference in the workplace in order to make up 
>> degenerate sexist woke quotas.
> 
> As women were NEVER given the chance to develop their Warriors skills 
> (except, maybe, for the Amazonians), they could not develope their 
> hunter/gather/Warrior skills.
> 
> As women were NEVER given the chance to develop their ARTISTIC skills, 
> SHOCK!! HORROR!!, they didn't become masterful/misstressful ARTISTS.
> 
> Now that WE have educated ourselves enough to OPEN OUR EYES, maybe, just 
> MAYBE, the World might reach its FULL POTENTIAL!!

It would be faster for Aggy to admit he's never had a relationship with 
a woman (and never will).

-- 
Facisim:  The first step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent

Bertrand Russell