Article <v4kput$3joiu$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v4kput$3joiu$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v4kput$3joiu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "undefined behavior"?
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:27:25 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <v4kput$3joiu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <666a095a$0$952$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <8t3k6j5ikf5mvimvksv2t91gbt11ljdfgb@4ax.com>
 <666a18de$0$958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <87y1796bfn.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <666a2a30$0$952$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <87tthx65qu.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v4dtlt$23m6i$1@dont-email.me>
 <NoEaO.2646$J8n7.2264@fx12.iad> <v4fc5j$2cksu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4ff97$2d8l1$1@dont-email.me> <87o784xusf.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v4g7i3$2icc2$1@dont-email.me> <87ikybycj6.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v4hk5v$2tttf$1@dont-email.me> <87cyojxlgj.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v4igj8$330vf$2@dont-email.me> <v4ko7d$3jbip$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="287e4cd145a2ef14a8930eb2f68b8217";
	logging-data="3793502"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Z5347i71Orla7qJ/tUgMyiMq7YvQL3I0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GuazGsB6QOKXirTp5s1pSwQAwJM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v4ko7d$3jbip$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2306

On 15/06/2024 19:57, David Brown wrote:
> 
> If you want BBX_RGBA to be a typedef for an unsigned 32-bit integer, write:
> 
>      typedef uint32_t BBX_RGBA;
> 
> If you want bbx_rgba() to be a function that is typesafe, correct, and 
> efficient (for any decent compiler), write :
> 
>      static inline BBX_RGBA bbx_rgba(uint32_t r, uint32_t g,
>              uint32_t b, uint32_t a)
>      {
>          return (r << 24) | (g << 16) | (b << 8) | a;
>      }
> 

Shouldn't that be ... ?

static inline BBX_RGBA bbx_rgba(uint8_t r, uint8_t g,
         uint8_t b, uint8_t a)