Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4lr0m$3tbpj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Whaddaya think? Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:51:33 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v4lr0m$3tbpj$1@dont-email.me> References: <666ded36$0$958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <20240616015649.000051a0@yahoo.com> <v4lm16$3s87h$4@dont-email.me> <v4lmso$3sl7n$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="567efb17d94aca7729125b64ceeb67a7"; logging-data="4108083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18GA5KziQQ39W1eTDJz2IkX" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:W/em4WONzTfaA4MTbCJwMXuTSXw= In-Reply-To: <v4lmso$3sl7n$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2141 On 16.06.2024 05:41, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > On 16.06.2024 05:26, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:56:49 +0300, Michael S wrote: >> >>> If you want to preserve you sanity, never use fscanf(). >> >> Quoth the man page <https://manpages.debian.org/3/scanf.3.en.html>: >> >> It is very difficult to use these functions correctly, and it is >> preferable to read entire lines with fgets(3) or getline(3) and >> parse them later with sscanf(3) or more specialized functions such >> as strtol(3). > > This would be also my first impulse, but you'd have to know > _in advance_ how long the data stream would be; the function > requires an existing buffer. So you'd anyway need a stepwise > input. [...] Would it be sensible to have a malloc()'ed buffer used for the first fgets() and then subsequent fgets() work on the realloc()'ed part? I suppose the previously set data in the malloc area would be retained so that there's no re-composition of cut numbers necessary? Janis