Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4mfp7$tga$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Underworld Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:45:59 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <v4mfp7$tga$1@dont-email.me> References: <v4ca44$e0k$40@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4efdo$26t0s$1@dont-email.me> <v4ek1d$2c4v$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4j2e6$39trb$1@dont-email.me> <v4k10e$2qk4$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d5a83a6a833044d7c8519d6337b9babb"; logging-data="30218"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19W3EhA33/cvDKd1CGBNtjgsOjPOtHHsc0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:hBOPK9jJC7Hlj4jIZhdcPbyPxjw= In-Reply-To: <v4k10e$2qk4$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> Bytes: 2461 The Doctor wrote on 15/6/24 10:21 pm: > In article <v4j2e6$39trb$1@dont-email.me>, > Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 9:09 pm: >>> In article <v4efdo$26t0s$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 >>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 12:08 am: >>>>> I can provide a review of all four parts of "Doctor Who: >>>>> Underworld" based on the transcripts from the website you >>>>> provided. I'll focus on the narrative elements, character >>>>> development, and overall story progression to rate each part out >>>>> of 10. >>>> >>>> Sorry!! WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, >>>> Gobble-de-gook?? >>>> >>>> Certainly not me!! >>> >>> http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/15-5.htm >> >> That may or may not be the website YOU, Gobble-de-gook, used but I >> didn't ASK for that, Gobble-de-gook, I asked *WHO* provided YOU, >> Gobble-de-gook, with some website, Gobble-de-gook!! > > How clueless are you Dannyboy? Not very, Gobble-de-gook, cause I can tell when a question is asked of me .... and then, usually, provide a logical answer to said question, Gobble-de-gook. WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, Gobble-de-gook?? -- Daniel