Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: The Acolyte Episode 3 Review ...
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:08:25 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4eb3c$263md$3@dont-email.me> <v4ganu$2mu7l$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on2icag4v8q1004@post.eweka.nl> <v4i8lo$31i4n$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on3ksuh3xkvm003@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:08:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="779bb655cdd1ad1aba93cb1723cf50a6";
	logging-data="201074"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TWng40CbzQ5igf0uyP64+sRVdZTJm/TM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KJEx8KEiSl7LPV8xfyM5/xemTgU=
In-Reply-To: <xn0on3ksuh3xkvm003@post.eweka.nl>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2734

On 15/06/2024 12:24, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
> 
>> On 14/06/2024 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>
>>> You don't need Overlord or Doomcock to tell you that. I'm a
>>> fair minded person that gives an honest opinion and "The
>>> Acolyte" is awful, and when I say awful... I mean AWFUL!!!
>>>
>>> Judging by your reaction to Doctor Who you'd probably have a
>>> conniption watching "The Acolyte"!
>>
>> Then it's a good job that other people are watching it for me
>> so that I don't have to.
> 
> You should still watch it for yourself at some stage... nobody
> can live their life based on what random people on YouTube say.

They are not random people. They are people who share the same views and 
opinions about entertainment as I do and therefore that makes them the 
best critics who can be trusted to tell me whether something is good or bad.

> Most of whom have some sort of agenda and are making money from
> their videos, so the more controversy the better.

That is what the woke critics being paid by the press have and how they 
make their money. How can anyone give the Acolyte 84% when the entire 
audience gives it 15%. Who are the greedy pigs with the agenda? It's not 
the people who say crap is crap. It's the ones selling the Emperor a 
non-existent birthday suit which is the bestest ever.

-- 
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it 
stands for." -William Shatner