Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: The Acolyte Episode 3 Review ... Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:08:25 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me> References: <v4eb3c$263md$3@dont-email.me> <v4ganu$2mu7l$1@dont-email.me> <xn0on2icag4v8q1004@post.eweka.nl> <v4i8lo$31i4n$1@dont-email.me> <xn0on3ksuh3xkvm003@post.eweka.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:08:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="779bb655cdd1ad1aba93cb1723cf50a6"; logging-data="201074"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TWng40CbzQ5igf0uyP64+sRVdZTJm/TM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:KJEx8KEiSl7LPV8xfyM5/xemTgU= In-Reply-To: <xn0on3ksuh3xkvm003@post.eweka.nl> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2734 On 15/06/2024 12:24, Blueshirt wrote: > The True Doctor wrote: > >> On 14/06/2024 20:03, Blueshirt wrote: >>> >>> You don't need Overlord or Doomcock to tell you that. I'm a >>> fair minded person that gives an honest opinion and "The >>> Acolyte" is awful, and when I say awful... I mean AWFUL!!! >>> >>> Judging by your reaction to Doctor Who you'd probably have a >>> conniption watching "The Acolyte"! >> >> Then it's a good job that other people are watching it for me >> so that I don't have to. > > You should still watch it for yourself at some stage... nobody > can live their life based on what random people on YouTube say. They are not random people. They are people who share the same views and opinions about entertainment as I do and therefore that makes them the best critics who can be trusted to tell me whether something is good or bad. > Most of whom have some sort of agenda and are making money from > their videos, so the more controversy the better. That is what the woke critics being paid by the press have and how they make their money. How can anyone give the Acolyte 84% when the entire audience gives it 15%. Who are the greedy pigs with the agenda? It's not the people who say crap is crap. It's the ones selling the Emperor a non-existent birthday suit which is the bestest ever. -- The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner