Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4oi9f$gnf3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Whaddaya think? Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:41:01 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <v4oi9f$gnf3$1@dont-email.me> References: <666ded36$0$958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <20240616015649.000051a0@yahoo.com> <v4lm16$3s87h$4@dont-email.me> <v4lmso$3sl7n$1@dont-email.me> <v4lr0m$3tbpj$1@dont-email.me> <8734pd4g3s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v4ltuj$3trj2$1@dont-email.me> <87y17530a0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v4mb92$3ak$1@dont-email.me> <87tths39yy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce947dcd9ea98bb3504b70234e0c429c"; logging-data="548323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LBcDcE/K57oscTvLfOsiC" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ehh287NYUAynIWF6OGiveZz3IgQ= In-Reply-To: <87tths39yy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Bytes: 2381 On 16.06.2024 22:32, Keith Thompson wrote: > Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: >> [...] K&R at >> least seems to say that 'void' can only be declared for the >> return type of functions that do not return anything. >> [...] > > No version of C has ever permitted "void main" except when an > implementation documents and permits it. [...] I cannot comment on main() being handled differently than other C functions. I was just quoting my old copy of K&R. I don't understand what you mean with "no version of C has ever permitted", given that my C compiler doesn't complain. WRT return value to the environment I'd expect any random or arbitrary value being returned in case that non had been explicitly specified to be returned. If I want a defined exit status (which is what I usually want) I specify 'int main (...)' and provide an explicit return statement (or exit() call). Janis