Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Underworld
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:10:16 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v4ouhl$j09h$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v4ca44$e0k$40@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4j2e6$39trb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4k10e$2qk4$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4mfp7$tga$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4mlpq$2oer$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:10:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3959e6528792a6960fe06a4b46eef321";
	logging-data="622897"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/012TDAzLrWWQNfL1iVFVGBYfPJMPbVY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:j0xjeW0Z/LbSnzjeho4v3RLQTsM=
In-Reply-To: <v4mlpq$2oer$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2826

The Doctor wrote on 16/6/24 10:28 pm:
> In article <v4mfp7$tga$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 15/6/24 10:21 pm:
>>> In article <v4j2e6$39trb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 9:09 pm:
>>>>> In article <v4efdo$26t0s$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 12:08 am:
>>>>>>> I can provide a review of all four parts of "Doctor Who:
>>>>>>> Underworld" based on the transcripts from the website you
>>>>>>> provided. I'll focus on the narrative elements, character
>>>>>>> development, and overall story progression to rate each part out
>>>>>>> of 10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry!! WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website,
>>>>>> Gobble-de-gook??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Certainly not me!!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/15-5.htm
>>>>
>>>> That may or may not be the website YOU, Gobble-de-gook, used but I
>>>> didn't ASK for that, Gobble-de-gook, I asked *WHO* provided YOU,
>>>> Gobble-de-gook, with some website, Gobble-de-gook!!
>>>
>>> How clueless are you Dannyboy?
>>
>> Not very, Gobble-de-gook, cause I can tell when a question is asked of
>> me .... and then, usually, provide a logical answer to said question,
>> Gobble-de-gook.
>>
>> WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, Gobble-de-gook??
> 
> You must be absolutely clueless Dannyboy.

Just wanting to find stuff out, Gobble-de-gook

WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, Gobble-de-gook??
-- 
Daniel