Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: The Acolyte Episode 3 Review ...
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:22:48 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v4ov95$j562$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v4eb3c$263md$3@dont-email.me> <v4i8lo$31i4n$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on3ksuh3xkvm003@post.eweka.nl> <v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4ntmj$2u4h$8@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:22:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3959e6528792a6960fe06a4b46eef321";
	logging-data="627906"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mTuIRoGUpQ3urbhM6QJfJvlJbPlXW/5U="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lJchoxtNd6/F7mroj1eIKA4kGH4=
In-Reply-To: <v4ntmj$2u4h$8@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2933

The Doctor wrote on 17/6/24 9:49 am:
> In article <v4nd79$64bi$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
> <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 15/06/2024 12:24, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>> On 14/06/2024 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> You don't need Overlord or Doomcock to tell you that. I'm a 
>>>>> fair minded person that gives an honest opinion and "The 
>>>>> Acolyte" is awful, and when I say awful... I mean AWFUL!!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Judging by your reaction to Doctor Who you'd probably have a 
>>>>> conniption watching "The Acolyte"!
>>>> 
>>>> Then it's a good job that other people are watching it for me 
>>>> so that I don't have to.
>>> 
>>> You should still watch it for yourself at some stage... nobody 
>>> can live their life based on what random people on YouTube say.
>> 
>> They are not random people. They are people who share the same
>> views and opinions about entertainment as I do and therefore that
>> makes them the best critics who can be trusted to tell me whether
>> something is good or bad.
>> 
>>> Most of whom have some sort of agenda and are making money from 
>>> their videos, so the more controversy the better.
>> 
>> That is what the woke critics being paid by the press have and how
>> they make their money. How can anyone give the Acolyte 84% when the
>> entire audience gives it 15%. Who are the greedy pigs with the
>> agenda? It's not the people who say crap is crap. It's the ones
>> selling the Emperor a non-existent birthday suit which is the
>> bestest ever.
>> 
> 
> ST is not doing well with Disney.

Star Trek isn't with Disney, Gobble-de-gook. It's with CBS-Paramount, I
think.
-- 
Daniel