Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4rheb$18s4m$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:44:37 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v4rheb$18s4m$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4f2nm$2augj$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d72f627d86519c6c4357db1f1228b2ee";
	logging-data="1339542"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+F7E7+MxG7ldt0o8Bebjkbuu3Xn2VE1cM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wl7+sb4SHLKDLZBY90ykLz6BPoQ=
In-Reply-To: <v4f2nm$2augj$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240617-10, 18/6/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2379

On 14/06/2024 1:20 am, Bill Sloman wrote:
> One option John Larjkin doesn't seem to have explored is using Renesas 
> HFA3096 five transistor array as basis for his mononstable and level 
> shifter.
> 
> It offers three 8GHz NPN parts and two 5.5GHz PNP parts in a single array.
> 
> https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3046-hfa3096-hfa3127-hfa3128-datasheet?r=494216
> 
> Two of the NPN parts could make up my emitter-coupled monostable, and 
> the two PNP parts could level shift the output.
> 
> The Renesas website offers Spice models for both the NPN and the PNP 
> transistors, which one could plug into an LTSpice simulation, at the 
> cost of making it look too messy for the more sensitive designers to be 
> able to look at.

I've spent that last four days in hospital with Covid-19 of the colon - 
dramatic when it started but tedious thereafter.

This thread hasn't gone all that well. John Larkin has ignored the fact 
that I was talking about just the 3096. There have been some sensible 
comments, but I'm still too sick to try and provide any kind of summing 
up of the sensible bits.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com