Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4s07h$1boeu$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:57:21 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 88 Message-ID: <v4s07h$1boeu$5@dont-email.me> References: <v4kf3h$3h3iu$7@dont-email.me> <v4m5l6$3v4ql$1@dont-email.me> <v4mmsd$1qt6$3@dont-email.me> <v4oo36$hnns$1@dont-email.me> <v4pc7t$ln46$3@dont-email.me> <v4revs$18him$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="817dd47f58e869d78494e0bf13c00909"; logging-data="1434078"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HytsZ6wKH7gvBWNOI+Y9c" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:6zF1xJUaAVl4znz5mrS11bvL4Bo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v4revs$18him$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4693 On 6/18/2024 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-06-17 13:03:56 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 6/17/2024 2:20 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-06-16 12:47:09 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> On 6/16/2024 2:53 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-06-15 16:22:09 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/13/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> > On 6/13/24 11:32 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> It is contingent upon you to show the exact steps of how H >>>>>> computes >>>>>> >> the mapping from the x86 machine language finite string input to >>>>>> >> H(D,D) using the finite string transformation rules specified by >>>>>> >> the semantics of the x86 programming language that reaches the >>>>>> >> behavior of the directly executed D(D) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Why? I don't claim it can. >>>>>> >>>>>> The first six steps of this mapping are when instructions >>>>>> at the machine address range of [00000cfc] to [00000d06] >>>>>> are simulated/executed. >>>>>> >>>>>> After that the behavior of D correctly simulated by H diverges >>>>>> from the behavior of D(D) because the call to H(D,D) by D >>>>>> correctly simulated by H cannot possibly return to D. >>>>>> >>>>>> _D() >>>>>> [00000cfc](01) 55 push ebp >>>>>> [00000cfd](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp >>>>>> [00000cff](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] >>>>>> [00000d02](01) 50 push eax ; push D >>>>>> [00000d03](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] >>>>>> [00000d06](01) 51 push ecx ; push D >>>>>> [00000d07](05) e800feffff call 00000b0c ; call H >>>>>> [00000d0c](03) 83c408 add esp,+08 >>>>>> [00000d0f](02) 85c0 test eax,eax >>>>>> [00000d11](02) 7404 jz 00000d17 >>>>>> [00000d13](02) 33c0 xor eax,eax >>>>>> [00000d15](02) eb05 jmp 00000d1c >>>>>> [00000d17](05) b801000000 mov eax,00000001 >>>>>> [00000d1c](01) 5d pop ebp >>>>>> [00000d1d](01) c3 ret >>>>>> Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d] >>>>> >>>>> When you put "V2" or "V3" or something similar on the subject line >>>>> you should tell what is different from the original version. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I ask what are the steps >>>> I provide 6 steps and then ask what are the next steps. >>>> I provide all of the steps. >>> >>> In which version? >>> >> >> *This is the simplest possible version* >> >> void DDD() >> { >> H0(DDD); >> } >> >> After six steps of DDD are correctly emulated by H0 >> what machine address of DDD would it be at? >> >> _DDD() >> [00001fd2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >> [00001fd3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >> [00001fd5] 68d21f0000 push 00001fd2 ; push DDD >> [00001fda] e8f3f9ffff call 000019d2 ; call H0 >> [00001fdf] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; housekeeping >> [00001fe2] 5d pop ebp ; housekeeping >> [00001fe3] c3 ret ; return to caller >> Size in bytes:(0018) [00001fe3] > > So how is this a difference between the original version and V2 and V3? > No params thus easier to see that it pushes its own machine address. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer