Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:18:32 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <v4s1f8$1c3jr$4@dont-email.me>
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:18:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c297682e1b5a8a64069ab9d5fe6da9b";
	logging-data="1445499"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DDWRrQZmZlWQIrYi3nYgb"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aY2kGFIctKFg+vhEax82vYtMlOM=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3604

On 6/14/24 3:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me>,
>   "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> 
>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/5th-circuit-court-of-appeals-strikes-down-t
>>> rump-bump-stock-ban/
>>
>>> A Trump administration ban on bump stocks-- devices that enable a shooter
>>> to rapidly fire multiple rounds from semi-automatic weapons after an
>>> initial trigger pull-- was struck down Friday by a federal appeals court in
>>> New Orleans.
>>
>>> The ban was instituted after a gunman perched in a high-rise hotel using
>>> bump stock-equipped weapons massacred dozens of people in Las Vegas in
>>> 2017. Gun rights advocates have challenged it in multiple courts. The 13-3
>>> ruling at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the latest on the issue,
>>> which is likely to be decided at the Supreme Court.
>>
>> This case was appealed to the Supreme Court by the government, and accepted
>> because of the circuit split. Garland v. Cargill
>>
>> Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, siding against the
>> government and in favor of Michael Cargill, the gun store owner who had
>> turned in two bump stocks to ATF to have standing to sue to have the
>> regulation overturned.
> 
> This is great news. The ban was struck down not on some technicality,
> but on the basis that the law says what it says and the BATF can't just
> decide it wants to 'interpret it' to mean something entirely different
> to conform to the politics of the moment and make instant felons out of
> hundreds of thousands of citizens who legally bought expensive equipment
> that the government refuses to reimburse them for while at the same time
> requiring them to surrender it to law enforcement. 

It was struck down by an illegitimate and corrupt court because they 
were paid to strike it down.

Once you get that, all rulings become clear.


-- 
On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony 
counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0