Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:48:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v4s389$1ch43$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4f2nm$2augj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4rheb$18s4m$1@dont-email.me>
 <g6337jpnoa9r0scjpilip21160c2blotud@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:48:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c952419a49d758c374e8695b3f000b96";
	logging-data="1459331"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183+u6KKlBBoKqNtMr3ZNfv"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f1wI9S6b3La1YRvQMouq3R6riCQ=
	sha1:vnDlN1OSTI4Z+rBVRl9cZZgxDUg=
Bytes: 2708

john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:44:37 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 14/06/2024 1:20 am, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>> One option John Larjkin doesn't seem to have explored is using Renesas 
>>> HFA3096 five transistor array as basis for his mononstable and level 
>>> shifter.
>>> 
>>> It offers three 8GHz NPN parts and two 5.5GHz PNP parts in a single array.
>>> 
>>> https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3046-hfa3096-hfa3127-hfa3128-datasheet?r=494216
>>> 
>>> Two of the NPN parts could make up my emitter-coupled monostable, and 
>>> the two PNP parts could level shift the output.
>>> 
>>> The Renesas website offers Spice models for both the NPN and the PNP 
>>> transistors, which one could plug into an LTSpice simulation, at the 
>>> cost of making it look too messy for the more sensitive designers to be 
>>> able to look at.
>> 
>> I've spent that last four days in hospital with Covid-19 of the colon - 
>> dramatic when it started but tedious thereafter.
>> 
>> This thread hasn't gone all that well. John Larkin has ignored the fact 
>> that I was talking about just the 3096. There have been some sensible 
>> comments, but I'm still too sick to try and provide any kind of summing 
>> up of the sensible bits.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bill Sloman, Sydney
> 
> OK, we can defer discussing your one-shot circuit until you feel
> better. I've had some medical adventures of my own.
> 
> 

My sympathies to both of you, coincidentally I am just getting back on my
feet after an eight day common cold from hell (was not Covid)


-- 
piglet