Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4scdi$1dvn9$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Shares Of AMC Networks Plunge 35%
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:25:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v4scdi$1dvn9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1049061278.740390968.349862.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
 <v4rp2t$1ai2j$1@dont-email.me> <v4s9ru$1d2uj$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:25:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d8e61e0dac3e5bc1dc45d49e945e1057";
	logging-data="1507049"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+catXjnInC4P9sok8C06eWwdoE8D3dfU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:k1JU9Q2M69SpdM/EoRrKhJYREhE=
In-Reply-To: <v4s9ru$1d2uj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3128

On 6/18/2024 11:41 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2024-06-18 08:12:51 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> 
>>> I think we can trace this directly to the announcement they will be airing
>>> NAUTILUS
> 
>>> Shares Of AMC Networks Plunge 35% As Company Plans Debt Sale To Raise Cash
> 
>>> https://deadline.com/2024/06/amc-networks-stock-price-plunges-bond-offering-1235976225/
> 
>> Ha! I think you can trace it back a few decades ago when they started
>> introducing commercials. First it was one commercial in the middle of a
>> movie, then they went full tilt with commercials every 10 minutes.
> 
>> If TCM could survive 30 years without commercials there's no reason AMC
>> couldn't have done the same thing, but they went for the easy money I
>> guess.
> 
> Every time you post your opinion, it utterly ignores reality. TCM was an
> imitation of AMC, even hiring away Robert Osborne. Shortly thereafter,
> Ted Turner stopped licensing any movie he had control of to AMC that he
> wanted instead to show on TCM. That forced AMC to completely change its
> model. Also, the issue of whether a satellite channel has commercials
> has to do with compensation from cable, whether it appears on a lower
> tier or a higher tier. Comcast moved TCM into a higher tier long ago
> when they demanded higher compensation and I'm sure other distributors
> did as well.
> 
>> Only a few big hits like The Sopranos and Mad Men probably kept their
>> heads above water this long. Now others with deep pockets like Amazon
>> and Apple have entered the fray.
> 
> Oh for fuck's sake. The Sopranos was on HBO. Mad Men was about men who
> worked in advertising, so of all tv shows one might expect to have
> commercials, that was the right series. In fact, you may recall it had
> INTEGRATED commercials at times.

So, 'Mad Men', being about advertising, is particularly well-suited to 
be broadcast with commercials?  That's a witticism, not a point...