Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times.
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:08:49 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <v4u064$1rm52$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v4pc0h$rfe$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <v4rkmk$19k32$1@dont-email.me> <uEfcO.13475$yMc7.4323@fx09.ams4>
 <v4s1r7$2kke$20@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1b105d3ef600eeb948b8e644a51be11";
	logging-data="1956002"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LKXDsfruAoV0nAf9d/zlfl01evx2+W/8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JpV26Q+fZTKJMMEpezxCSMM5bVQ=
In-Reply-To: <v4s1r7$2kke$20@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 3372

The Doctor wrote on 18/06/2024 11:24 pm:
> In article <uEfcO.13475$yMc7.4323@fx09.ams4>,
> Hornplayer9599  <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>> On 6/18/2024 04:40, Daniel70 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/6/24 11:00 pm:
>>>> In article <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor Pangloss wrote:
>>>>>>> On 17/06/2024 00:38, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the most
>>>>>>>> accurate,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since they are the only numbers they must be the most
>>>>>>> accurate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good of you to be so candid with us. Or do I mean ‘Candide’?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way, this best-of-all-possible-worlds optimism is an
>>>>>> interesting change from you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve done a quick * packet estimate for Disney+ based on iMDB
>>>>> interactions for episode 7 in another thread. If we assume that
>>>>> people rating 3 or more probably watched the episode, even if
>>>>> people rating 1 or 2 didn’t, then to date Disney+ has racked up
>>>>> about 2m viewers worldwide so far for The Legend of Ruby Sunday -
>>>>> or about the same as the U.K.
>>>>
>>>> Do not swear.
>>
>> Dave, if you aren't adult enough to handle any swearing, the Dr. Who
>> moderated group is this way --------->
> 
> No longer exists and the word in mention is a "Homophobic slur"

Bullshit, Gobble-de-gook, it still exists, indeed, I check in on it 
every time I come on line!!

I'm guessing .... Whoever WAS the Moderator has gone by the wayside, so 
no-one can post there!!

>>> Buggered if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are the Moderator of this/these
>>> Newsgroups, Gobble-de-gook, but, in any case ..... WHERE DID MIKE SWEAR,
>>> Gobble-de-gook??

OH!! Gobble-de-gook, YOU omitted to answer the above question!!
>>>
>>> Or are YOU, (the under-educated) Gobble-de-gook, confusing "fag" with
>>> some naughty, naughty, word, Gobble-de-gook??-- 
Daniel