| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v4u0c6$1rno9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times. Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:12:03 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: <v4u0c6$1rno9$1@dont-email.me> References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me> <v4pc0h$rfe$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4rkmk$19k32$1@dont-email.me> <v4s19u$2kke$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:12:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1b105d3ef600eeb948b8e644a51be11"; logging-data="1957641"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MpIYMhqtgeXnDPVzOeGu/1XFKa3CjaT0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18 Cancel-Lock: sha1:AUEIz+nbLAI0RoyY2YG9+s04dLk= In-Reply-To: <v4s19u$2kke$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> Bytes: 2916 The Doctor wrote on 18/06/2024 11:15 pm: > In article <v4rkmk$19k32$1@dont-email.me>, > Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 17/6/24 11:00 pm: >>> In article <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor >>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> The True Doctor Pangloss wrote: >>>>>> On 17/06/2024 00:38, Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the most >>>>>>> accurate, >>>>>> >>>>>> Since they are the only numbers they must be the most >>>>>> accurate. >>>>> >>>>> Good of you to be so candid with us. Or do I mean ‘Candide’? >>>>> >>>>> Either way, this best-of-all-possible-worlds optimism is an >>>>> interesting change from you. >>>> >>>> I’ve done a quick f*g packet estimate for Disney+ based on iMDB >>>> interactions for episode 7 in another thread. If we assume that >>>> people rating 3 or more probably watched the episode, even if >>>> people rating 1 or 2 didn’t, then to date Disney+ has racked up >>>> about 2m viewers worldwide so far for The Legend of Ruby Sunday - >>>> or about the same as the U.K. >>> >>> Do not swear. >> >> Buggered if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are the Moderator of this/these >> Newsgroups, Gobble-de-gook, but, in any case ..... WHERE DID MIKE SWEAR, >> Gobble-de-gook?? >> >> Or are YOU, (the under-educated) Gobble-de-gook, confusing "fag" with >> some naughty, naughty, word, Gobble-de-gook?? > > And the njumber say ... "njumber"?? WHAT the FUCK is a "njumber", Gobble-de-gook, and how does it connect to this situation, Gobble-de-gook?? -- Daniel