Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4u0c6$1rno9$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times.
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:12:03 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v4u0c6$1rno9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4pc0h$rfe$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v4rkmk$19k32$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4s19u$2kke$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:12:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1b105d3ef600eeb948b8e644a51be11";
	logging-data="1957641"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MpIYMhqtgeXnDPVzOeGu/1XFKa3CjaT0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AUEIz+nbLAI0RoyY2YG9+s04dLk=
In-Reply-To: <v4s19u$2kke$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2916

The Doctor wrote on 18/06/2024 11:15 pm:
> In article <v4rkmk$19k32$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/6/24 11:00 pm:
>>> In article <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor Pangloss wrote:
>>>>>> On 17/06/2024 00:38, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the most
>>>>>>> accurate,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since they are the only numbers they must be the most
>>>>>> accurate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good of you to be so candid with us. Or do I mean ‘Candide’?
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, this best-of-all-possible-worlds optimism is an
>>>>> interesting change from you.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve done a quick f*g packet estimate for Disney+ based on iMDB
>>>> interactions for episode 7 in another thread. If we assume that
>>>> people rating 3 or more probably watched the episode, even if
>>>> people rating 1 or 2 didn’t, then to date Disney+ has racked up
>>>> about 2m viewers worldwide so far for The Legend of Ruby Sunday -
>>>> or about the same as the U.K.
>>>
>>> Do not swear.
>>
>> Buggered if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are the Moderator of this/these
>> Newsgroups, Gobble-de-gook, but, in any case ..... WHERE DID MIKE SWEAR,
>> Gobble-de-gook??
>>
>> Or are YOU, (the under-educated) Gobble-de-gook, confusing "fag" with
>> some naughty, naughty, word, Gobble-de-gook??
> 
> And the njumber say ...

"njumber"?? WHAT the FUCK is a "njumber", Gobble-de-gook, and how does 
it connect to this situation, Gobble-de-gook??
-- 
Daniel