Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v4v5n4$236bi$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Simulating termination analyzers for dummies --- The only reply until addressed Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:49:23 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: <v4v5n4$236bi$2@dont-email.me> References: <v4oaqu$f9p5$1@dont-email.me> <v4sc6v$1e9dc$1@dont-email.me> <v4scnm$1eb2f$3@dont-email.me> <v4sd4d$1edq0$2@dont-email.me> <v4sdjm$1eb2f$7@dont-email.me> <v4u8eu$1tcfc$1@dont-email.me> <v4unh5$1vpm0$9@dont-email.me> <v4v5gc$fhqs$8@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0498080d6b8a2710b4ab7de903a0762"; logging-data="2201970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183ggqGfTJqFIhv5a5y5D08" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rGaE0jcecRGkg9uTk8NZzhHk1Jw= In-Reply-To: <v4v5gc$fhqs$8@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2836 On 6/19/2024 12:45 PM, joes wrote: > Am Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:47:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: >> On 6/19/2024 4:30 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-06-18 16:45:42 +0000, olcott said: >>>> On 6/18/2024 11:37 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-06-18 16:30:46 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> On 6/18/2024 11:21 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>> On 2024-06-17 03:33:50 +0000, olcott said: > >>>>>>> The subject line is incorrect. The OP of "Simulating termination >>>>>>> analyzers for dummies" should tell what a "simulating termination >>>>>>> analyzer" is. >>>>>>> The OP of this thread does not. >>>>>> I state the prerequisites if you don't have them then you cannot >>>>>> understand. If you have them then what I say is self-evidently true. > What do you call this, argument from obscurity? You should explain better. > > void DDD() { H0(DDD); } _DDD() [000020a2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [000020a3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [000020a5] 68a2200000 push 000020a2 ; push DDD [000020aa] e8f3f9ffff call 00001aa2 ; call H0 [000020af] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; housekeeping [000020b2] 5d pop ebp ; housekeeping [000020b3] c3 ret ; never gets here Size in bytes:(0018) [000020b3] Exactly which step of DDD emulated by H0 was emulated incorrectly such that this emulation would be complete? AKA DDD emulated by H0 reaches machine address [000020b3] -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer