Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:44:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:44:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c64deeef54593d1938d941691bc3ec9";
	logging-data="2220070"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AztYPCOMVA8dFjxeMa6rBc19cvndRuHg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJekFsV/BLVtuHHZOHZ6/nZwCW8=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2449

On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
>>>>
>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>>>>
>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
>>>> trespassing.
>>>
>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
>>> 'social justice'.
>>
>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
> 
> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
> residential neighborhood.

Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground, I'd 
say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.