| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v4vbqc$24f37$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: "Drakon" by S. M. Stirling Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:33:31 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <v4vbqc$24f37$1@dont-email.me> References: <0001HW.2C0BDD05000713EB7000090E038F@news.supernews.com> <v4k3d5$3fg9u$1@dont-email.me> <ld5kflFu232U1@mid.individual.net> <robertaw-8D53D0.10034615062024@news.individual.net> <v4kj0l$3ifm5$1@dont-email.me> <robertaw-8563C7.09480816062024@news.individual.net> <v4o33o$ab71$1@dont-email.me> <v4qd77$v30v$1@dont-email.me> <v4qjko$10658$1@dont-email.me> <v4qmh1$10mc5$1@dont-email.me> <robertaw-D3EBEB.21520117062024@news.individual.net> <v4snjn$1gjq1$1@dont-email.me> <2g957j5m5qfpevnuuojggu1d98la2vgrpv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 21:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b36cae8151da7ce5387bd3c9e98923ff"; logging-data="2243687"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/J6dX/Kwl1Oc+OBVNrYZT2" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:7gm5tX/qTh+htw8F59IsoYVeGzc= In-Reply-To: <2g957j5m5qfpevnuuojggu1d98la2vgrpv@4ax.com> Bytes: 3238 The Horny Goat wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:36:21 -0400, William Hyde > <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote: > >> However, Ontario also received a number of "delayed loyalists", i.e. >> Americans attracted by free land, well after the war(1). As these >> proved far from loyal to the British in the war of 1812(2), perhaps your >> grandmother had a point. >> > > I've never seen a source that suggested land in modern day southern > Ontario was free though it was a fraction (I've read 1/3) of what the > US was selling land for in what is now the Midwest. > > Again - in British eyes there were enough of them that it was felt to > be a security threat in the region between London (ON) and York (now > Toronto) though in the event these settlers chose loyalty to their > land rather than to their former country. My sense of it is that most of them hunkered down and were content to go with whoever won. Any pro-American action they might have been tempted to take was nipped in the bud by the Americans themselves, as James mentioned. Some did join the militia, however. So they were not all as neutral as I implied above. Some Canadian army units include battle honours from this war in their record which I believe descend from contemporary militia units. But the inhabitants of Quebec and the Maritimes did far better. The defenders of this province were largely British regulars and native forces. You are quite right about the Berton, though I confess it's been a long time since I read it. I gave it and "Vimy" to an American friend who wondered if Canada had been in the world wars. William Hyde