Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v52f3h$2q3gj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: California Bans Non-White Paper Shooting Targets Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 23:48:01 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v52f3h$2q3gj$1@dont-email.me> References: <Ua6cnWPzMZYw8-n7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6319927542c2db0495365ee5de6f13b2"; logging-data="2952723"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QuHW/8BDXk1r4ivUOg5EsNGiuJWsb8TY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ldu/1gbIlagtr6yCi1Cq+stOxC0= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 1886 BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Ah, California... the stupidity never stops. <sigh> >This is the target we used for requals. We always questioned why it is that >we were only shooting white guys. >-------------------- >https://americancop.com/banning-targets/ >Since at least 2013, a tremendous number of agencies have suffered from >"Good Idea Fairy" visits. I’m specifically addressing those "good ideas" >that will reportedly fix society's ills but have little to no factual >foundation. Generally, these stem from politicians "doing something" to fix >a problem. >Some of these include-- claiming there is no national standard for using >force while trying to throw out Graham v Connor, ignoring SCOTUS rulings >like United States v Whren to attack pro-active policing, or protesting the >release of positive body-worn camera footage. Wait. What? I thought the whole point of footage from body-worn cameras was to produce needed evidence and to make it publicly available. >. . .