Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:55:33 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v52mil$jund$6@i2pn2.org>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4el9m$3rsd6$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v4f3ec$2akmh$2@dont-email.me> <v4g65a$3tn6q$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4g6vr$2ic0g$1@dont-email.me> <v4gc0b$3tn6r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gcjc$2msea$1@dont-email.me> <v4geab$3tn6r$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gg0s$2nim8$2@dont-email.me> <v4ha63$3v16r$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hfq9$2sdqr$5@dont-email.me> <v4hp3r$3viml$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hv85$3021v$1@dont-email.me> <v4ju8f$222a$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4k1m4$3f99u$1@dont-email.me> <v4k4mt$3fnqu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4maeo$3vv3f$1@dont-email.me> <v4mnim$1qt6$6@dont-email.me>
 <v4onga$hjo3$3@dont-email.me> <v4pbg4$ln46$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4rdtp$18al3$1@dont-email.me> <v4rvil$1boeu$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4s9hj$1dnm7$1@dont-email.me> <v4sa0h$1dk9i$3@dont-email.me>
 <v4sci6$1ebce$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
 <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me> <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <v51f4t$2k8ar$1@dont-email.me> <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:55:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="654061"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3323
Lines: 39

On 6/20/24 11:04 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/20/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-20 05:15:37 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>
>>>> Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.
>>
>>> I really don't care what you believe.
>>> It is not about belief.
>>> It is about correct reasoning.
>>
>> No, it is not. It is about language maintenance. If you cannot present
>> your reasoning in Common Language it does not matter whether your
>> reasoning is correct.
>>
> 
> I cannot possibly present my reasoning in a convincing way
> to people that have already made up their mind and closed it
> thus fail to trace through each step of this reasoning looking
> for an error and finding none.

BNo, we are open to new ideas that have an actual factual

> 
> If you simply leap to the false assumption that I am wrong
> yet fail to point out any mistake because there are no mistakes
> this will only convince gullible fools that also lack sufficient
> technical competence.
> 

We don't leap from false assumption, we start with DEFINTIONS.

YOU seem to leap to the false assumption that you can just change the 
definitions, which you can not.

When your statement are base on false definitions, that you refuse to 
see are wrong, you are just stuck in your lies, and think the world is 
against you, when what is against you is TRUTH, because your world is 
just built on LIES.