Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:43:05 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v543hp$lkkb$6@i2pn2.org>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4g65a$3tn6q$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4g6vr$2ic0g$1@dont-email.me> <v4gc0b$3tn6r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gcjc$2msea$1@dont-email.me> <v4geab$3tn6r$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gg0s$2nim8$2@dont-email.me> <v4ha63$3v16r$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hfq9$2sdqr$5@dont-email.me> <v4hp3r$3viml$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hv85$3021v$1@dont-email.me> <v4ju8f$222a$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4k1m4$3f99u$1@dont-email.me> <v4k4mt$3fnqu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4maeo$3vv3f$1@dont-email.me> <v4mnim$1qt6$6@dont-email.me>
 <v4onga$hjo3$3@dont-email.me> <v4pbg4$ln46$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4rdtp$18al3$1@dont-email.me> <v4rvil$1boeu$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4s9hj$1dnm7$1@dont-email.me> <v4sa0h$1dk9i$3@dont-email.me>
 <v4sci6$1ebce$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
 <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me> <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <v51f4t$2k8ar$1@dont-email.me> <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
 <v539bk$329sv$1@dont-email.me> <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:43:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="709259"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3328
Lines: 39

On 6/21/24 9:21 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/21/2024 2:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-20 15:04:35 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 6/20/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-20 05:15:37 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.
>>>>
>>>>> I really don't care what you believe.
>>>>> It is not about belief.
>>>>> It is about correct reasoning.
>>>>
>>>> No, it is not. It is about language maintenance. If you cannot present
>>>> your reasoning in Common Language it does not matter whether your
>>>> reasoning is correct.
>>>
>>> I cannot possibly present my reasoning in a convincing way
>>> to people that have already made up their mind and closed it
>>> thus fail to trace through each step of this reasoning looking
>>> for an error and finding none.
>>
>> If you can't convince the reviewers of a journal that your article is
>> well thought and well written you cannot get it published in a
>> respected journal.
>>
> 
> The trick is to get people that say I am wrong
> to point out the exact mistake. When they really
> try to do this they find no mistake and all of
> their rebbutal was pure bluster with no actual basis.
> 

No we do, its just you don't like that the problem is you asked the 
wrong question.

It seems beyond your understanding that you hav WASTED two decades of 
work looking at the wrong thing.